Matt horne is a gay boy!
- Jake barnes
Jake Barnes is a gay boy!
- Savannah A (:
Savannah A is a hoe!
- Annonymous (:
Cloning is asexual reproduction. There are all kinds of research that can be done on stem cells without creating any actual embryo or causing the gestation of an embryo in order to give birth to a new organism.
Stem cell research and therapy have sparked controversy due to ethical concerns related to the use of embryonic stem cells obtained from human embryos. This has raised ethical debates around the beginning of life and the destruction of embryos. Some oppose this research on moral or religious grounds, while others argue for the potential benefits of stem cell therapies in treating various diseases and injuries.
The first concern is the destruction of human embryos to extract stem cells. Pro-life activists argue that embryos are a form of life and should be allowed to live. Another argument is that stem cell research can devalue human life as it can lead to consent of reproductive cloning.
Potential sources of embryonic stem cells include excess embryos from in vitro fertilization procedures, donated embryos from fertility clinics, and embryos created through somatic cell nuclear transfer (therapeutic cloning). These stem cells are used in research to study development and disease, as well as in potential treatments for conditions like spinal cord injuries and diabetes.
The official stance of Jehovah's Witnesses is that they do not have a specific teaching on the acceptability of stem cell therapy. However, they may have individual beliefs based on their interpretation of biblical principles. It is recommended for Jehovah's Witnesses to consult with their religious leaders for guidance on this issue.
Cloning is asexual reproduction. There are all kinds of research that can be done on stem cells without creating any actual embryo or causing the gestation of an embryo in order to give birth to a new organism.
Stem cell research and therapy have sparked controversy due to ethical concerns related to the use of embryonic stem cells obtained from human embryos. This has raised ethical debates around the beginning of life and the destruction of embryos. Some oppose this research on moral or religious grounds, while others argue for the potential benefits of stem cell therapies in treating various diseases and injuries.
Embryonic stem (ES) cells can be obtained from embryos that are donated for research purposes. These embryos are typically leftover from in vitro fertilization procedures and are donated with informed consent. Researchers can then extract the ES cells from these embryos for use in research studies.
The first concern is the destruction of human embryos to extract stem cells. Pro-life activists argue that embryos are a form of life and should be allowed to live. Another argument is that stem cell research can devalue human life as it can lead to consent of reproductive cloning.
Potential sources of embryonic stem cells include excess embryos from in vitro fertilization procedures, donated embryos from fertility clinics, and embryos created through somatic cell nuclear transfer (therapeutic cloning). These stem cells are used in research to study development and disease, as well as in potential treatments for conditions like spinal cord injuries and diabetes.
The official stance of Jehovah's Witnesses is that they do not have a specific teaching on the acceptability of stem cell therapy. However, they may have individual beliefs based on their interpretation of biblical principles. It is recommended for Jehovah's Witnesses to consult with their religious leaders for guidance on this issue.
Absolutely. The use of adult cells from the donor is not only safe but totally eliminates any need for immunosuppressive drugs when the area of the body needing treatment is able to be treated using the donors own cells. At birth there is also the possibility of collecting umbilical cord blood cells for use in this research. There have been a number of specific successes in this field. Thus there is no need to murder in order to save life.
The two most widely used types of stem cells in science today are embryonic stem cells, which are derived from embryos, and induced pluripotent stem cells, which are reprogrammed adult cells. These cells are valued for their ability to differentiate into various cell types and their potential for use in regenerative medicine and research.
Stem cells themselves are not controversial. There are different types of stem cells. Hematopoietic stem cells are the building blocks of blood. They are found in bone marrow and umbilical cord blood. They are currently used successfully to treat a number of different diseases. These are not controversial at all. Embryonic stem cells are controversial because they are obtained from embryos. Some people believe that using embryos to produce stem cells is unethical. The 'embryos' the anti-stem cell voice talk about contain about 75 - 200 cells, and are known as blastocytes. The cells are undifferentiated, meaning they as yet have no purpose. The Pro-Life movement refer to this collection of cells as a human being about 2-4 days after fertilization. Blastocytes are the best source of undifferentiated stem cells, and those used would be the excess discarded after IVF. They would generally be destroyed - why not use them to save human life? For Pro-Life- destroy these 'embryos' or use them to save life? Please explain your stance!
Pene grande
Scientists use stem cells because they can generate healthy cells and replace disease ones. Plus they allow them to test and better understand disease and test new drugs for effectiveness.
Right now scientists are exploring many options with stem cells. Currently they can combine a persons body fat and some stem cells, mix them with some growth factors, and inject them in the patient. The body will then start to work with the stem cell, body fax mixture to regrow body tissue.