wars are not a good way to resolve conflicts because children are orphaned , women are widowed . It dries up the kindness in peoples heart and turns them into worthless brutes . it is doom and destruction for those who wage it and for those who survive it. hence universal brotherhood must be encouraged amongst the people
no wars are not a good way to conflict two countries war is a crime and crime is war no body should have war presidents should talk through it
wars bring destruction
no because many people shed their blood
no,it is not,as many people die in wars and many children become orphaned,and many wifes become widows,and many families also gets distracted.
There are no conflicts between Muslims and Sikhs. Historically, there were wars between the Mughal Empire (which was an Islamic Empire in India) and the Sikhs who revolted and proceeded to create their own empire. There was also violence between Sikhs and Muslims and Hindus during the Independence of India and Pakistan. There is also mild anti-Sikh feeling in Pakistan since Sikhs maintain good relations with Ahmadis, who are are considered Muslim heretics by Sunni Pakistanis. However, general relations between the groups are relatively good. The recent relaxing of tensions between India and Pakistan has allowed for cross-border religious tourism.
If only the human race was that simplistic - -
In concept, war is not GOOD. War is conducted in modern times for a specific reason such as defeating an evil fascist leader who is committing genocide (such as Hitler, Hussein, etc). It is not necessarily conducted just to end conflicts between countries. For instance, the US has a conflict with the leaders of North Korea. Have the leaders of the US chosen to go to war with them merely because we have a conflict with them? No. The Gulf War conducted by the United Nations had a reason that was good and valuable. They chose to come to the aid of Kuwait when the Kuwait people asked the UN for help. They did not have a large army or the means to defeat Hussein's military might. The UN saved their nation and their oil (even though Hussein's men did damage some of the oil wells). The Kuwait people were very glad not to be overrun and oppressed by that "monster". The best way to end conflicts between people groups is to use a win win tactic or solution. That is why the United Nations was formed. To work things out. If you think they just sit around there making money you are wrong. They actually work out very complex and difficult problems between people groups. Many solutions have been concluded in that place. Sometimes it is better to ignore a people group as the US and many other nations around the world have with a gangster nation like Somalia. The US has taken the lets wait and see tactic with the North Koreans. What most people do not understand about North Korea and South Korea and the rest of the world is that the Korean war never ended. There was a cease firing but never a surrender or armistice that ended the war. There are still military people at that border. So the war could restart if the UN chose to fight back against any aggression by the North Koreans. The Cold war stayed cold because neither nation of the Soviet Union and the United States wanted to have total war with one another. They just had a huge value conflict over whether communism or democracy is better. The silly boys had their awful arms race but in the end they finally came to their senses and ended the debate between each other. (Crazy I know.) So war is not the solution to all conflicts between nations. Sometimes it is better to resolve the problem over the conference table and other times it is better to avoid any contact and other times it is better to "sit on it". But, when you have a "Hitler and the Nazis" you cannot and should not be slow to stop them. Ask any Jew who had been in the concentration camp and they will say "What took you so long?"
Where Iran and Iraq are concerned, neither is a "good guy". Both are rather problematic countries at this point. The lesser of two evils in Iraq, but that is not saying much.
A good way to solve conflicts is to compromise. :)
There are many times where there have been conflicts on a team. You could resolve these conflicts by looking at both sides of the argument and compromising.
War is an extension of the political process and often leads to peaceful negotiations .
Because of economic differences between the north and south. They were unable to resolve their conflicts and the south seceded from the U.S.A.
Some eternal conflicts of man include the struggle between good and evil, the battle between desires and responsibilities, and the tension between freedom and security. These conflicts have been prevalent throughout history and continue to shape human experiences and decisions.
Be a good listener; Resolve conflicts in a mature and honest way; Comfort your brother when he confronts a challenge or fails; Help him with homework and other responsibilities; Encourage your brother to pursue his interests and goals.
To fix is to resolve the problem for good. To repair is to fix temporally
The Religious conflicts is when, one is torn between good and evil.
no,it is not,as many people die in wars and many children become orphaned,and many wifes become widows,and many families also gets distracted.
The southis bad but the north is good! this does not help anyone at all!
she was good because she tried to resolve the conflict between Egypt and Rome.
You've only strengthened my resolve to provide a good example. Let's resolve this issue congenially.