0
Many present and former Supreme Court justices have written books, but William O. Douglas was, perhaps, the most prolific. Douglas, who served on the bench from 1939 until 1975, was an outdoorsman and ardent environmentalist. In his opinion for Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 US 727 (1972), Douglas argued that inanimate objects should have standing to sue for their own protection in court.
A few of William O. Douglas' (approximately) 30 titles are still in print: Of Men and Mountains: Memoir of a Wilderness Adventurer; Go East, Young Man: The Autobiography of of William O. Douglas: The Early Years; and Nature's Justice: Writings of William O. Douglas (essays).
A few other authors among the justices:
Oliver Wendel Holmes, Jr.: The Common Law; The Path of Law (Justice Holmes was son of the famous writer and physician Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.)
Louis Brandeis: Other People's Money: And How the Bankers Use It
Joseph Story: Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States
John Jay: Commentaries on the Constitution
Stephen Breyer: Active Liberty: Interpreting our Democratic Constitution
Sandra Day O'Connor: The Majesty of Law: Reflections of a Supreme Court Justice; Lazy B
Clarence Thomas: My Grandfather's Son
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Are US Supreme Court Justices rich people?
Most of them are wealthy, not because of their salary on the Court, but because of outside activities, such as speaking engagements, book sales, investments, etc.NoteUS Supreme Court justices are prohibited from taking money for speaking engagements while in office; this is considered an ethics violation, and may be an impeachable offense. Justices can only be reimbursed for their expenses while still on the bench.
What did President Roosevelt call the US Supreme Court?
The Nine Old MenWhile President Franklin D. Roosevelt was credited with creating the nickname "The Nine Old Men" in reference to the US Supreme Court and its elderly justices, the phrase was originally coined by newspaper columnists Drew Pearson and Robert W. Allen in 1932.Pearson and Allen wrote a regular column called Washington Merry-Go-Round and, in 1932, published a book named More Merry-Go-Round, that included a chapter about the Supreme Court justices titled "Nine Old Men." The label stuck, much to the dismay of the Court.To make matters worse, Pearson and Allen released a book titled Nine Old Men in 1936. Justices Cardozo and Brandeis, progressives who were both over 70, were especially offended by the authors' characterization of the Court.Roosevelt used the label with great frequency during his 1937 court-packing campaign.
When was the US Supreme Court first called the Nine Old Men?
While President Franklin D. Roosevelt was credited with creating the nickname "The Nine Old Men" in reference to the US Supreme Court and its elderly justices, the phrase was originally coined by newspaper columnists Drew Pearson and Robert W. Allen in 1932.Pearson and Allen wrote a regular column called Washington Merry-Go-Round and, in 1932, published a book named More Merry-Go-Round, that included a chapter about the Supreme Court justices titled "Nine Old Men." The label stuck, much to the dismay of the Court.To make matters worse, Pearson and Allen released a book titled Nine Old Men in 1936. Justices Cardozo and Brandeis, progressives who were both over 70, were especially offended by the authors' characterization of the Court.Roosevelt used the label with great frequency during his 1937 court-packing campaign.
How have the duties of the supreme court been derived?
The Congress defines the duties of the Supreme Court.
What has the author Edward C Hegeler written?
Edward C. Hegeler has written: 'A protest against the Supreme Court of Illinois' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Illinois. Supreme Court, Legal ethics, Illinois
Who wrote 'The Supreme Court and Human Rights'?
There are two possible answers to this question.The first is an article in The Hindu about the Supreme Court in India:Rajagopal, Balakrishnan. "The Supreme Court and Human Rights." The Hindu. Op-Ed, December 6, 2000 onlineThe second is a book of essays edited by Burke Marshall. Although the book is out of print, it appears to be available through several used booksellers.Marshall, Burke, ed. The Supreme Court and Human Rights. Washington, DC: United States International Communication Agency, 1982. Print. Forum series.
What is a authors note?
An Authors Note Is The Comments Given By The Author Of A Book About The Book. The Authors Note Is Usally Found At The Very Beggining Of The Book Or The Very End.
can three people coauthor a book?
A book can have more than three authors-- a book can have as many authors as contributed to the book. However, most publishers will ask to limit the authors' names to the fewest, with secondary authors listed on a front page.
What is required for the Supreme Court to reach a decision?
US Supreme Court cases typically involve complex questions of constitutional or federal law.Most of the appellate cases originate in one the Circuit courts (U.S. Court of Appeals for the [Specific] Circuit), which is the intermediate court between the District (trial) Courts and the US Supreme Court. These are not to be confused with the US Circuit Courts that existed between 1789 and 1911, which were primarily trial courts.On rare occasions, cases may be appealed directly from District (trial) Court to the Supreme Court, bypassing the Circuit Court. For example, United States v. Nixon, (1973), the dispute over whether the President was required to release the Watergate tapes to the Special Prosecutor, was appealed directly from the District Court. The flag desecration cases tried under the Flag Protection Act of 1989 were appealed directly to the US Supreme Court because Congress had specifically mandated that in the legislation.The Supreme Court also considers cases on appeal from (or rejected for appeal by) State supreme courts, provided the case is of national importance and involves constitutional or federal law. The justices do not rule on state constitutional issues or state and municipal statutes.The Supreme Court decides to hear a case on three major factors: whether the case was an appeal by the federal court and is in conflict with the decisions of other circuits; the general importance of the case; and whether the lower court's decisions may be wrong in light of the Supreme Court's opinions.Most cases accepted on appeal involve decisions that conflict with the High Court's interpretation of the Constitution or federal law, or that the Justices believe need clarification in order to establish a precedent for application across all lower courts. (See Rule 10, below)The Court also hears a limited class of cases (such as disputes between states) under original jurisdiction, which means the Supreme Court is the first (and in this case, only) court to hear the dispute. The U.S. Supreme Court hears appeals of decisions made by lower level state and federal criminal courts and interprets federal and Constitutional law. The Supreme Court's most important responsibility is to rule on cases where the claimant alleges his or her Constitutional rights have been violated.The Supreme Court only hears a small number of the petitions it receives each year. When the justices decline to rule on a particular case, the decision of the lower court becomes final.Some of the important historical issues reviewed by the court include issues involving slavery and racism, abortion rights, capital punishment (which remains controversial), authority of the federal government over state governments, restrictions on freedom of speech, the rights of people accused of crimes, and so on.The Court's interest and attention shifts over time. During the 50s and 60s, the Court focused extensively on Civil Rights; during the later 1960s and 70s, it reviewed many questions of 14th Amendment violations; and more recently, it has focused on state's rights issues and the Constitutionality of federal laws.The Court has established rules governing its process and procedures, among these being Rule 10, which helps determine whether certiorari should be granted or denied. The Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States, adopted in October 2007, states the following:Rule 10. Considerations Governing Review on Writ of Certiorari"Review on a writ of certiorari is not a matter of right, but of judicial discretion. A petition for a writ of certiorari will be granted only for compelling reasons. The following, although neither controlling nor fully measuring the Court's discretion, indicate the character of the reasons the Court considers:(a) a United States court of appeals has entered a decision in conflict with the decision of another United States court of appeals on the same important matter; has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with a decision by a state court of last resort; or has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, or sanctioned such a departure by a lower court, as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power;(b) a state court of last resort has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with the decision of another state court of last resort or of a United States court of appeals;(c) a state court or a United States court of appeals has decided an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by this Court, or has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this Court.A petition for a writ of certiorari is rarely granted when the asserted error consists of erroneous factual findings or the misapplication of a properly stated rule of law."Granting certiorari does not necessarily mean the Court disagrees with the final appellate court decision; there have been many instances in which those verdicts have been affirmed. Likewise, denying certiorari is not an indication that the Court agrees with the appellate court decision.
What was the authors purpose for writing the book Oliver Twist?
what was authors purpose for writing the book oliver twis
What court is a case most likely to make its way to the supreme court?
A case is most likely to make its way to the Supreme Court if it involves a constitutional question or if there is a significant legal issue that needs clarification. Additionally, cases that have conflicting decisions from lower federal courts or state supreme courts have a higher chance of being heard by the Supreme Court. Ultimately, the Court has discretion in deciding which cases it wants to hear.
What has the author Charles Warren written?
Charles Warren has written: 'A history of the American bar' -- subject(s): Law, Lawyers, Courts, History 'The Supreme court in United States history' -- subject(s): Accessible book, History, Law, U.S. Supreme court, United States, United States. Supreme Court 'La Suprema corte y las disputas entre estados' -- subject(s): Constitutional law, United States, United States. Supreme Court 'The trumpeters of the Constitution' -- subject(s): Constitution 'Congress, the Constitution and the Supreme Court' -- subject(s): Constitutional history, United States, United States. Congress, United States. Supreme Court, History 'The early history of the Supreme Court of the United States in connection with modern attacks on the judiciary' -- subject(s): United States, United States. Supreme Court 'Bankruptcy in United States history' -- subject(s): Bankruptcy 'History of the Harvard Law School and of early legal conditions in America' -- subject(s): Harvard Law School, Harvard University, Lawyers, Registers, Law, History, Harvard University. Law School 'The Supreme court and the World court' -- subject(s): Permanent Court of International Justice, United States, United States. Supreme Court
