Want this question answered?
I am a science teacher at Adamerritt k-8 center and a scientific way to say period is either table or you can say perioda red
metodo cientifico
I would say Galileo.
Combretum bracteosum is the scientific name of the hiccup nut. Some people say the nut causes hiccups and some say it cures them.
The term is homo sapiens.
when it happens to me
credibility of pseudo-scientific techniques? I also wanted to say about credibility of Pseudoscience which it is consists of statements, beliefs, or practices that claim to be both scientific and factual but are incompatible with the scientific method. We knew that Pseudoscience is often characterized by contradictory, exaggerated or unfalsifiable claims; reliance on confirmation bias rather than rigorous attempts at refutation; lack of openness to evaluation by other experts; absence of systematic practices when developing hypotheses; and continued adherence long after the pseudoscientific hypotheses have been experimentally discredited
Antarctica is not a country, it is a continent dedicated to the scientific study of the health of planet earth. Insofar as 'beliefs' are concerned, one could say that belief in science is supreme.
There is no publicly available information confirming or denying Owen Hargreaves' religious beliefs or practices. Therefore, it is not possible to definitively say whether he is Muslim or not.
I guess you could say that it was the catholics. Some people saw that the catholic religion had strayed very far from the original beliefs and practices of Christs church so they tried to create churches closer to those original practices using the doctrines in the bible
If I had to say something it would be anything that cannot be tested. Existence of god, ghosts, etc. as the basis of the scientific method is to prove a hypothesis through tests and observations. Kinda butchered the explanation but you get what I mean. (I hope.)
Assuming that RE stand for religious Education. I would say that belief is important because some of the things that are being dealt with can simply not be proven. So the only way that the subject can be seriously handled is to start on the basis that the basis is true, and that is belief.
Scientists try to find out more about the natural world. They regard questions about the existence or otherwise of souls as outside their field. Others may interpret scientific knowledge as helping to define whether souls exists, but that is not the intention. Individual scientists may hold personal beliefs about whether souls exist, but these beliefs are private and not based on scientific evidence.
Scientific the thing scientific is that people say they are nice then other people say they are mean so there is an opinion about dolphins
Yes there is a rise in pagan beliefs. People are not as afraid to say they are pagan or wiccan anymore. People are not as quick to Jude anymore, so no one really fells they have to hide like we use to.
that would depend on the persons own beliefs and the beliefs of the people who have the say on the holy ground, they are both christian beliefs with similar ideals, why not?? that would depend on the persons own beliefs and the beliefs of the people who have the say on the holy ground, they are both christian beliefs with similar ideals, why not??
de meilleures pratiques / lesmeilleures pratiques