The enzymes likely denatured at 70°C, losing their shape and function due to excessive heat. This would cause a sharp decrease in the reaction rate compared to 60°C where the enzymes were still active and efficient.
The most likely hypothesis for the experiment was that increasing the temperature would speed up the reaction.
If the hypothesis is supported in an experiment, the expected outcome or result predicted by the hypothesis will likely be observed. This would provide evidence to validate the hypothesis and support the initial reasoning or explanation provided.
P-value is short for "Probability Value." It is a measure of statistical significance whereas the p-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic at least as extreme as the one that was actually observed, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. The lower the p-value, the less likely the result is if the null hypothesis is true, and consequently the more "significant" the result is.
This substance is likely a type of metal, such as indium, which has a melting point around 70 Celsius and a higher melting point, around 75 Celsius which is in its solid state.
The scientific method involves making observations, forming a hypothesis, designing an experiment, collecting data, analyzing results, and drawing conclusions. To discover vitamin C, researchers would likely start by observing symptoms of deficiency, formulating a hypothesis that a certain substance could alleviate these symptoms, conducting experiments to test the hypothesis, and ultimately confirming the presence and benefits of vitamin C through rigorous testing and analysis.
The hypothesis that enzymes are denatured at higher temperatures is likely to explain the result at 60 degrees Celsius and 70 degrees Celsius. As temperature increases, enzymes lose their structural integrity and no longer function properly. This can lead to a decrease in enzyme activity or complete loss of function, depending on the extent of denaturation.
The hypothesis that cooking temperature affects the rate of chemical reactions in food ingredients is most likely to explain the results of cooking at 60°C and 70°C. The higher temperature likely led to faster chemical reactions, resulting in more pronounced changes in the food's texture, flavor, and color compared to cooking at 60°C.
The hypothesis that enzyme activity is affected by temperature is likely the best explanation for the results at 60 and 70°C. Enzymes have an optimal temperature range for activity, and deviations from this range can decrease enzyme effectiveness. At 60 and 70°C, the enzyme may have been denatured, leading to reduced activity.
Enzymes never work at higher temperatures
To answer a specific question, scientist form a hypothesis. If the hypothesis cannot be testable or answered, they'll give you a prediction of what will most likely happen from the results of the hypothesis.
Enzymes never work at higher temperatures
To answer a specific question, scientist form a hypothesis. If the hypothesis cannot be testable or answered, they'll give you a prediction of what will most likely happen from the results of the hypothesis.
A result which is consistent with a hypothesis adds weight to the evidence in favour of that hypothesis: it makes it more likely that the hypothesis is true. But you can never ever confirm a scientific hypothesis. The best that you can do is to show that an alternative hypothesis is unlikely. There could be another hypothesis which is better than the one you started with as well as the alternative that you compared it with: but you simply do not know.
When results support the hypothesis, it means that the data collected in the study aligns with the initial prediction or proposed explanation. This is a positive outcome as it suggests that the hypothesis was likely accurate in predicting the relationship between variables. It adds credibility to the research findings and provides evidence to support the researchers' claims.
The least likely outcome after conducting an experiment to test a hypothesis is the complete absence of any findings or results. Experiments are designed to provide insight or data, so it is rare for an experiment to yield no information whatsoever.
After forming a hypothesis, a scientist is most likely to design and conduct experiments to test the hypothesis. This involves systematically collecting data and making observations to determine whether the hypothesis is supported or refuted. The results of these experiments will help the scientist draw conclusions and may lead to further testing or the development of new hypotheses.
The substrate has changed shape because of the high temperature.