Want this question answered?
It would be pointless doing the experiment and not measuring accurately
If there is a factor that confuses the result of an experiment, I would call that a design flaw in the experiment. It might also be an uncontrolled variable.
Because the measurement usually requires putting the measurement device in the experiment. Just observing an experiment effects it because you are interpreting the results.
-- If the bulbs are in parallel, then the addition of a bulb has no effect on the brightness of those that were there before. -- If the bulbs are in series, then the addition of a bulb causes the brightness of those that were there before to decrease. (And I wasn't even there when you did the experiment !)
Sort of depends on what you're observing (watching a rocket go into orbit would be a fine example where waiting for "steady state" would be silly) but in many cases the results are false (or weird) until things quiet down.
Values you have recorded during your experiment
Values you have recorded during your experiment
Observation.
Observation in the Scientific Method means using your senses to interact with your experiment. You would observe the experiment for smell, sound, temperature, color, etc. and record those observations as part of your data.
Be clear about the purpose of the experiment.
If it is the same experiment attached to link, you would need only 1 trial each unless you want to retry if there is more grain or shape distribution. There is no requirement for how many time in repeating experiment since it is observation experiment not measuring experiment.
There are two types of observation. There is what is referred to as the qualitative observation and what is referred to as quantitative observation. Qualitative observations do not deal with numbers, but rather details of an experiment per se. An example would be how a precipitate looks that was formed from a reaction. Quantitative observations deal with numbers; an example would be the amount of a substance (in grams) formed from a completed reaction.
Experiment. How do i know? I take FLVS and i finish module 1 for 1_05
Presumably yes, but given that the question does not actually describe the experiment or observation performed, there is no way to answer this question more concretely.
This would be considered an observation. It is a direct result of a specific experiment or test, where the metal is burned in a closed container and the contents remain unchanged. It does not represent a law or a theory, which are more general principles or explanations about the natural world.
well most likely the material would probably burn...how about you experiment??
a.) Bacteria was present on the meat at the start of the experiment.