The accepatable reason would be Reasonable Suspicion, or Reasonable Cause To Believe that you are, were, or will be, involved in a criminal act.
Health concerns, moral concerns, and safety concerns are considered to be acceptable reasons for restrictions of privacy rights.
One of the most common standards used is national security. If the safety of the public outweighs someone's privacy, then it is a reasonable exception.
if you turn on the privacy switch people request to follow you instead of just following you and only your friends see your pics
Privacy and security
There is no required action of an employer if an employee does not follow the privacy policy. Most companies, however, will terminate and employee for not following their guidelines for keeping the privacy policy.
All of the above
shredded
That depends on what you believe is acceptable. Most people would disagree. Every person needs a degree of privacy. If you believe he is invading your privacy, then no. He should not be at all. He should not. But, if he does it is certain that he doesn't trust you.
Absolutely. Telling anyone that they aren't allowed to marry- regardless of gender- is, at absolute minimum, a major intrusion into your personal life.
respect for peoples right to privacy
Employees may use this opportunity to snope into other people privacy
right to privacy
Respecting privacy is good for clinical outcomes. It makes customers (patients) more confident about getting care and providing full information to their care providers. State privacy laws did not always provide complete protection. More use of electronic records has raised privacy concerns, because of the magnitude of potential data exposures, and the federal law is designed to help. A standard "floor" of federal privacy protections was considered necessary.
Yes.