Legalism is a form of philosophy that taught that government should pass strict laws. It also references that these strict laws should be enforced through harsh punishments when necessary.
Article VIII of the US Constitution states that no excessive bail nor heavy fines should be imposed. Cruel and unusual punishments should also not be inflicted.
The Articles were a document that acted as a plan of government, but it loosely bound the states. The reason for the loosebinding was because it was believed that as little power as possible should be exerted upon states, and that states should have the most power. So the United States was not a country, it was a group of independent states that worked together. But soon enough, people knew the new government was not working, so the Articles were thrown away (figuratively) and the constitution replaced it.
Say that they are not used like the should be today, like people don't enforce it good
The Great Awakening, a religious revival movement in the 18th century, had a significant influence on the philosophy of government expressed in the Declaration of Independence. It emphasized individual beliefs, personal convictions, and the idea of religious freedom, which aligned with the concept of individual rights and liberty expressed in the Declaration. The Great Awakening helped shape the idea that governments should respect these individual rights and that people have the right to overthrow a government that infringes upon them, as stated in the Declaration of Independence.
Representative Government
The philosophy that taught a government should pass strict laws and use harsh punishments is called Legalism. Legalism originated in China during the Warring States period and emphasized the importance of strong central authority for maintaining social order and stability.
The philosophy that taught that government should pass strict laws and enforce them with harsh punishment is known as Legalism. Legalism was an ancient Chinese philosophy that emphasized the use of strict laws and severe punishments to maintain social order and obedience to authority.
yes!
abraham lincoln
free market system
Laissez-Faire Capitalism
Just enough to enforce the constitution... or atleast that's the way our forefathers saw it
While it is not necessary for a ruler to be a philosopher, having a strong philosophical background can greatly benefit a ruler. Philosophical training can help a ruler think critically, make more ethical decisions, and have a deep understanding of governance.
no because you should be able to believe what ever you want to! and NOBODY should tell you different!
The limits of cloning sould be enforced by both the Institutional Review Board and the Government
Citizens should take the law into their own hands when the government will not, or cannot, enforce the law.
President Jefferson's philosophy was rooted in the belief that government should have limited interference in industry. He believed that a laissez-faire approach, with minimal regulation and intervention, would allow the economy and individual businesses to thrive. This philosophy extended beyond industrial intervention to a broader belief in limited government involvement in citizens' lives.