Pushing the boundaries of knowledge out of self-interest and glory is dangerous. (APEX)
Scientific obsession requires that one exchange one's soul for knowledge.
a scientist should not go beyond moral boundaries when trying to gain personal recognition or fame.
got it from brainly
It is a social science, yes. But technically, isn't everything a science?
8 out of 10 cats agree.
Science is a discipline in which precision is important. Vocabulary must be equally understood by all persons. In order for students to comprehend the texts in Science, they must be able to understand the vocabulary, and agree upon the meaning.
The struggles of common people are the most powerful artistic subjects.
As you know 95% people agree that you should first take your materials you want and study them as you do you tell children about them
Mary Shelley would likely agree that unchecked pursuit of scientific knowledge and advancement can lead to unforeseen consequences and ethical dilemmas, as seen in Frankenstein. She would caution against playing God and disrupting the natural order without considering the potential repercussions on society and humanity.
Mary Shelley's novel "Frankenstein" explores the theme of the pursuit of knowledge without considering the consequences. She would likely agree with the cautionary tale that scientific advancements should be made responsibly, with ethical considerations and accountability for the potential impacts on society and the environment.
Yes, I agree with Rizal's view that the pursuit of science is an ideal for humanity. Science enables progress, fosters critical thinking, and drives innovation that benefits society as a whole. Embracing scientific knowledge can lead to advancements in various fields and ultimately improve the quality of life for individuals and communities.
yez
It is a social science, yes. But technically, isn't everything a science?
Confucius believed that practical skills and ethical conduct should take precedence over academic pursuits. He emphasized the importance of applying knowledge to improve society and cultivate moral character, rather than pursuing intellectual knowledge for its own sake. Confucius valued a well-rounded education that integrated practical experience and ethical principles over academic study alone.
They agreed on Natural Rights (life liberty and the pursuit of happiness)
Ona would likely agree with the statement that capitalism can exploit individuals and communities in pursuit of profit, as depicted in "The Jungle" by Upton Sinclair. Through the novel's portrayal of the exploitation of immigrant workers in the meatpacking industry, Ona would likely resonate with the idea that capitalism can lead to social injustice and harsh working conditions.
If you are speaking of true science and not therretical science, then the Bible and science can agree. I have written article on SCIENCE AND THE SCRIPTURES and there is no disagreement between them.
The internet LOL I agree, but specifically we can look at many articles and blogs on science.
That it, and we, exist.
i hate science projects comment if u agree.