The mitochondria and chloroplasts are used as evidence supporting the endosymbiotic theory. Both organelles have their own circular DNA, replicate independently of the cell, and have a double membrane structure similar to certain prokaryotes.
Fossil records, anatomical similarities, embryological development, and genetic similarities are all forms of evidence that support the theory of evolution. These pieces of evidence show the gradual changes in species over time and provide support for the idea that all organisms are related through common ancestry.
The endosymbiotic theory is widely accepted as a strong scientific hypothesis; however, definitive proof is challenging due to the lack of direct observational evidence from billions of years ago when the theorized events occurred. While there is substantial supporting evidence, such as the similarities between organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts with free-living bacteria, the theory cannot be definitively proven beyond any doubt.
Because there's supporting evidence for it. Lots of supporting evidence. Overwhelming, awe-inspiring amounts of supporting evidence.A scientific theory is not just a guess. My chemistry teacher explained it this way: a theory is something we can explain (the theory of evolution or the theory of relativity). A law is something we can't explain (the law of gravity. We know it works, we're just not sure exactly why or how).Charles Darwin spent years developing his hypothesis of natural selection. There is ample evidence supporting his final theory, some found long after his death. To this day, archeologists still find fossil evidence that fits into Darwin's explanation of changing species.
Endosymbiosis theory is based on the idea that certain organelles within eukaryotic cells, such as mitochondria and chloroplasts, were once free-living prokaryotic organisms that were engulfed by a host cell through a symbiotic relationship, eventually becoming a permanent part of the cell. This theory is supported by evidence such as the presence of these organelles having their own DNA, ribosomes, and replication machinery like prokaryotic cells.
The endosymbiotic theory is a scientific hypothesis that proposes that eukaryotic cells evolved from symbiotic relationships between different types of prokaryotic cells. Specifically, it suggests that organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts were once independent prokaryotic organisms that were engulfed by larger cells and developed a mutually beneficial relationship. This theory is supported by evidence such as the similarities between organelles and certain types of bacteria.
There is no evidence supporting it, and all the more evidence supporting the less controversial models of human evolution, based on evolutionary theory.
me and your mom
No. A theory is more certain: it is a hypothesis which has had some supporting evidence.
The three main pieces of evidence supporting the Big Bang theory are the cosmic microwave background radiation, the abundance of light elements in the universe, and the redshift of galaxies.
Lynn Margulis is the American biologist known for her work on the endosymbiotic theory. She proposed that chloroplasts and mitochondria evolved from ancient prokaryotic cells that were engulfed by a host cell. Her research provided evidence supporting the idea that these organelles have their own DNA and replicate independently within eukaryotic cells.
osama bin laden and adolf Hitler
Yes, because if enough people prove the hypothesis and produce evidence supporting it it can become a theory.
Fossil records, anatomical similarities, embryological development, and genetic similarities are all forms of evidence that support the theory of evolution. These pieces of evidence show the gradual changes in species over time and provide support for the idea that all organisms are related through common ancestry.
The 'big bang' theory.
The endosymbiotic theory is widely accepted as a strong scientific hypothesis; however, definitive proof is challenging due to the lack of direct observational evidence from billions of years ago when the theorized events occurred. While there is substantial supporting evidence, such as the similarities between organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts with free-living bacteria, the theory cannot be definitively proven beyond any doubt.
for all using Plato the answer is G) all of the above.
the two scientists that brought forth supporting his evidence was South African Geologist Alexander Du Toit and Swiss geologist Emile Argand.