Nebraska and Maine do not simply award all their votes to the state-wide winner. They award one vote to the winner in each separate congressional district and two votes to the state-wide winner.
which tow states do not use the "winner takes all" method
Nebraska and Maine
2
Supporters of winner-take-all congressional elections appreciate the simplicity and clarity it brings to the electoral process. They argue that it produces clear winners and makes the outcome more decisive, avoiding potential confusion or ambiguity. Additionally, winner-take-all elections often result in stronger, stable governments as they tend to produce majority rule and discourage the formation of coalitions or fragmented political parties.
None
winner-take-all basis
It is an attempt by the states to have individual voters make a larger impact. Using this system, Nebraska's 2nd District, (containing Omaha) can vote democratic in a largely republican state, and they aren't drown out by the rest of the state.
winner-take-all basis
Yes, some states do require that local elections must be held in the in-between years when no national elections take place. This is done to separate local elections from the more prominent and highly contested national elections, allowing local issues to receive more attention and ensuring that local officials are elected with a focus on local concerns. However, this requirement varies from state to state, and not all states have such a provision.
It is when the process when in some states you get all of the delegates if you get the most votes
The Winner-Take-All election
Nebraska and Maine
It is when the process when in some states you get all of the delegates if you get the most votes
There has never been a national election in the United States in which the general public voted. State elections for national offices take place in November.