it is by repeating the experiment a few times which make the results more reliable
i think to make i more reliable i would add more stuff to it
Depending on the size/importance of the experiment, they can either simply repeat as normal or if needed gather more resources for the experiments. Scientists always perform experiments at least three times, to make sure nothing is abnormal in an experiment.
no.
Look for the answer in your book. Its there.
In a valid experiment all the variables are kept the same apart from those being investigated.
A control is needed in a valid experiment because without controls then more then one variable is being tested. This can mess up the results.
A valid experiment is characterized by a clear hypothesis, a control group for comparison, random assignment of participants, and the ability to replicate the results. It should also have ethical considerations and controls in place to minimize bias and confounding variables.
Draw a valid conclusion for that experiment.
To be valid, an experiment must not include bias, confounding variables, or unreliable measures in order to accurately assess the cause-and-effect relationship between variables.
cheese
A valid one. An experiment cannot conclusively prove anything if more than one independent variable is altered at a time. That being said, many dependent variables could show change and the experiment would still be valid, as long as only one independent variable was altered at a time. An experiment that changes only one variable at a time is called a controlled experiment.
to make the experiment more reliable
I.What types of plants were used in the experiment?II.What was the experiment's control? III.Was the experiment repeated more than once?
To make an experiment more accurate you would have to repeat the experiment 3-5 more times to make it reliable and also you would do what Liverpool college do and compare the answers with other people in the class, community or teacher.
Repeatable
3