Want this question answered?
The answer will depend on what the comparison is to be made with and also on how "better" is being judged. The arithmetic average is the best linear unbiased estimate as well as the maximum likelihood estimate of the centre. The best estimate for the spread depends on whether the data comprise the population or a sample from the population.
Millimeters may be appropriate, or perhaps centimeters. If a fish is 63 mm long, then it would be 6.3 cm long. U have to take the fish out of the aquarium
1 kilogram, one gram would be about a piece of paper
No. Four decimeters is 40 centimeters, which is less than half a yard stick. Four meters would be a better answer. That is about 13 feet.
If you estimate well, you get exactly 291.
400 quarts is a better estimate.
I am guessing you can use Gallons.
form_title= Saltwater Aquarium form_header= Install a saltwater aquarium in your home. What size aquarium would you like to install?*= _ [50] Have you ever owned a saltwater aquarium?*= () Yes () No What animals would you like to have in the aquarium?*= _ [50]
they would do great. With no fish to uproot and eat the leaves thy would be great. They would be even better if ferts were added
A "Terrarium" would be the dirt filled opposite to an Aquarium
No. A better estimate would be 380. The actual total is 379.
54.5 kilograms would be a better estimate.
It would be better to give the turtles very, very small pieces of carrot, or shredded carrot.
the larger you r sample size the better your estimate. imagine take the height of person to estimate the average high of an adult male. would one person's height be a good estimate, or would taking the average height of 100, or 5000 adult males will produce a better estimate?
Only a very large aquarium would be suitable.
In lakes and rivers unless your into the aquarium hobby, then they would swim in a fish tank/aquarium.
In lakes and rivers unless your into the aquarium hobby, then they would swim in a fish tank/aquarium.