Want this question answered?
swinging your arms around in circles very quickly
All forces are vector quantities. Consequently, if "centrifugal force" actually existed, it would be a vector quantity.
Centrifugal force is the outward force of a rotating object. The opposite force is the centripetal force which maintains the object in it's rotational position. In the case of an orbiting satellite it's rotational speed (revolutions per time period) creates the centrifugal force required to overcome the gravitational pull (centripetal force) of the body it is orbiting. ================================== The first answer is a neat, tidy, well-written summary of perhaps the most popular misconception in all of elementary Physics. Centrifugal force is a concept made up to account for the sensation of force that we perceive when we move in a curve. There need not be any outward force on a rotating object, and in general there is none. Centripetal force is real. It's the force required to bend the path of a moving abject away from a straight line. There is no outward force on an orbiting satellite. No force is required, and none exists, to 'overcome' the centripetal gravitational pull. In fact, if there were a force that overcame the gravitational centripetal force, then the forces on the satellite would sum to zero and it would travel in a straight line.
when net force is zero
A small mass with a lot of force applied.
swinging your arms around in circles very quickly
All forces are vector quantities. Consequently, if "centrifugal force" actually existed, it would be a vector quantity.
Then the moon would fall on us and we would start eating spaghetti.
The earth takes the shape of an oblate ellipsoid due to centrifugal forces perpendicular to the axis of rotation. there is zero centrifugal force at the poles and the force increases to a maximum at the equator. Other relatively minor variations in the shape of the earth are due to variations in the density of the crust and geomorphological processes. The centrifugal force acts to reduce the weight of the water in the equatorial hole, and the water would rise there to greater height. Newton then argued that water anywhere would rise to the same level
Centrifugal force
they would produce corn
they would produce corn
Centrifugal force is the outward force of a rotating object. The opposite force is the centripetal force which maintains the object in it's rotational position. In the case of an orbiting satellite it's rotational speed (revolutions per time period) creates the centrifugal force required to overcome the gravitational pull (centripetal force) of the body it is orbiting. ================================== The first answer is a neat, tidy, well-written summary of perhaps the most popular misconception in all of elementary Physics. Centrifugal force is a concept made up to account for the sensation of force that we perceive when we move in a curve. There need not be any outward force on a rotating object, and in general there is none. Centripetal force is real. It's the force required to bend the path of a moving abject away from a straight line. There is no outward force on an orbiting satellite. No force is required, and none exists, to 'overcome' the centripetal gravitational pull. In fact, if there were a force that overcame the gravitational centripetal force, then the forces on the satellite would sum to zero and it would travel in a straight line.
A ball park figure for the weight of a double decker bus might be about 15,000 kilograms. But to calculate the centrifugal force on a turbine blade with this hanging from it would require the blade length and the rotational speed of the turbine.
Yes a central magnet rotating with an array of magnetic material surrounding it spun at the relative speed so as not to defeat the magnetic field would create a centrifugal arrangement if that is the query.
when net force is zero
which tubes?