0
While some primary sources are considered more reliable than others consider that every source is what in some way?
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
biased :
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How can scientists identify reliable sources from unreliable ones?
unreliable sources show nothing close to many reliable sources
How do you tell the difference between a reliable source and an unreliable source?
Only experience can tell you that. A source whose information checks out when compared to reality (e.g. other sources) is usually reliable, while a source whose data turns out not to match reality would be considered unreliable.
Source of history?
Sources of history come in many forms. Ancient history, for example, is discovered from ancient writings, the contents of tombs and the remains of ancient societies revealed by archaeologists.More recent history can be sourced from old newspapers, diaries of historic figures and from the writings of earlier historians. Sources are almost unlimited however what are called primary sources are the most reliable ones. The patent awarded to the Wright Brothers, is a primary source of information regarding how their "airplane" was constructed.
When we study the motive of a primary sources writer were looking into issues of potential?
bias
What building materials were used in medieval times?
They mainly used stone and the early version of bricks; they were the most reliable and renewable sources back then!
What While some primary sources are considered more reliable than others consider that every source is in some way.?
biased :
While some primary sources are considered more reliable than others consider that every source is in some way?
biased
Why would it be wrong to think that primary sources are more reliable than secondary sources?
While primary sources are valuable for firsthand accounts, they can still be biased or incomplete. Secondary sources provide analysis and interpretation of primary sources, offering a broader perspective. It's essential to consider multiple sources to gain a comprehensive understanding of a topic.
Is secondary sources are easier to find than primary sources to evaluated integrity?
Secondary sources are generally easier to find than primary sources because they summarize or analyze information from primary sources. However, in terms of evaluating integrity, primary sources are generally considered more reliable as they provide firsthand information without interpretation or bias that may be present in secondary sources.
Do you think primary sources or secondary sources are more valuable to modern historians and why?
Primary sources are more valuable to modern historians because they are more reliable.
How to find good primary sources?
What are some good reliable primary resources can you find on Jean Paul Marat
What advantages do primary sources have over secondary sources?
Primary sources provide firsthand accounts or direct evidence of events, while secondary sources interpret or analyze information provided by primary sources. Primary sources are often more reliable and can provide unique perspectives that may not be found in secondary sources. They can offer a deeper understanding of historical events or issues.
Actual records that have survived are considered?
primary sources
What are the comments you read considered to be?
Primary Sources.......-maria...Apex(:
What kinds of documents are considered primary sources?
personal correspondence
What are comments you read considered to be?
Primary Sources.......-maria...Apex(:
Why is primary research reliable?
Primary research is considered reliable because it involves collecting firsthand data directly from the source, such as through experiments, surveys, or observations. This reduces the chance of errors or misinterpretations that can occur when using secondary sources. Additionally, primary research allows for greater control over the research process, ensuring that the data collected is specific to the research objectives.
