Augustus
Tiberius
Caligula
Claudius
Nero
The five ancient Rome is emperors there where only five emperors
The "first citizens" of Rome were always the emperors.
Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, and Nero
No, there were 50 emperors before Constantine.
All Roman Emperors were famous in their own way. There were 192 people who claimed the title Emperor of Rome from 27 BC when the Emperor Augustus took control of the Senate until 1185 AD. Some of the later such would now be called Byzantine Emperors, but a the time they called themselves Roman Emperors. Second answer. Generally speaking most historians separate the ancient Roman empire and the Byzantine empire. The Byzantine empire lasted until 1453 AD when the Ottoman Turks took over Constantinople.
The five ancient Rome is emperors there where only five emperors
The "first citizens" of Rome were always the emperors.
The "first citizens" of Rome were always the emperors.
In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.
Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, and Nero
No, there were 50 emperors before Constantine.
All Roman Emperors were famous in their own way. There were 192 people who claimed the title Emperor of Rome from 27 BC when the Emperor Augustus took control of the Senate until 1185 AD. Some of the later such would now be called Byzantine Emperors, but a the time they called themselves Roman Emperors. Second answer. Generally speaking most historians separate the ancient Roman empire and the Byzantine empire. The Byzantine empire lasted until 1453 AD when the Ottoman Turks took over Constantinople.
First the kings, then the consuls, then the emperors.
No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.
The Roman Empire was not a kingdom. It was Empire. Empires have Emperors.
There are no emperors in Rome now-a-days, and nobody is persecuting Christians in Rome. Indeed, Rome is the centre of the Roman Catholic Church.
You could say that Rome had two emperors in the year 180. At first it was Marcus Aurelius, but he died in 180 and his son Commodus became emperor in the same year.You could say that Rome had two emperors in the year 180. At first it was Marcus Aurelius, but he died in 180 and his son Commodus became emperor in the same year.You could say that Rome had two emperors in the year 180. At first it was Marcus Aurelius, but he died in 180 and his son Commodus became emperor in the same year.You could say that Rome had two emperors in the year 180. At first it was Marcus Aurelius, but he died in 180 and his son Commodus became emperor in the same year.You could say that Rome had two emperors in the year 180. At first it was Marcus Aurelius, but he died in 180 and his son Commodus became emperor in the same year.You could say that Rome had two emperors in the year 180. At first it was Marcus Aurelius, but he died in 180 and his son Commodus became emperor in the same year.You could say that Rome had two emperors in the year 180. At first it was Marcus Aurelius, but he died in 180 and his son Commodus became emperor in the same year.You could say that Rome had two emperors in the year 180. At first it was Marcus Aurelius, but he died in 180 and his son Commodus became emperor in the same year.You could say that Rome had two emperors in the year 180. At first it was Marcus Aurelius, but he died in 180 and his son Commodus became emperor in the same year.