other scientists
society
society
No. Once they've published their results, pretty much anyone is free to use them in any way they want as long as it isn't illegal for some other reason.
No. Once they've published their results, pretty much anyone is free to use them in any way they want as long as it isn't illegal for some other reason.
IUPAC; International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry.
In computing, one would say: "scalability", as in: "this database is not scalable". I believe the more scientific term for this is "generalisation", but I'm not sure about that, there might be a better word.
. Other scientists must be able to repeat the test and get the same results.
"Short" in Spanish is usually "corto", but when applied to a person, you would say "bajo". For feminine objects, substitute an "a" for the final "o".
Yes. If a scientific theory cannot be "falsified" - that is, proven to be not true - then it isn't "scientific". A scientific theory will always lead to some tests that can be performed. If the test fails - that is to say, if your theory doesn't behave in accordance with the experimental results - then we can say that the theory is "disproved". This is the problem with a lot of the "global warming" and "global climate change" hysteria; the computer models for climate change make a number of predictions, but the models don't behave as predicted. The global climate change theory is, if we judge by the results of the models, disproved.
how do you say the word final in jamaica
Why do you still say that her results are assumed?
Thet get VERY hot so look out. They are possibly a fire hazzard and NOT worth the RISK!