The plaintiff in a civil trial is the person that is making the claim. In a criminal trial it is the government.
The sides in a civil trial are the same as a criminal trial. There is a plaintiff and a defendant. In a criminal trial the plaintiff is usually the jurisdictioni charging the defendant.
Plaintiff/Defendant
plaintiff
He will give his side of the story, the same way the plaintiff did when plaintiff testified.
Question is unclear . . . If the defendant/plaintiff is guranteed the "right to a fair trial," then the defendant/plaintiff's corresponding responsibility would seem to be, to tell the truth in all matters pertaining to the trial. We all know how likely THAT is to happen.
The name of the plaintiff in the trial depicted in "To Kill a Mockingbird" is Mayella Ewell, a young white woman who accuses Tom Robinson, a black man, of raping her.
In a trial, the two main types of attorneys are defense attorneys who represent the accused and prosecutors who represent the government and present the case against the accused. Defense attorneys work to protect the rights of the defendant and provide a defense against the charges, while prosecutors work to prove the guilt of the accused.
No, a witness testifying that they personally saw the defendant strike the plaintiff is not considered hearsay. Hearsay involves relaying information heard from someone else outside of the courtroom. Since the witness is providing firsthand knowledge of the event, their testimony is typically admissible as direct evidence.
The plaintiff in the 'To Kill a Mockingbird' trial was Mayella Ewell, the young woman who accused Tom Robinson, a Black man, of rape.
i have not answer
In a Criminal Trial, you have a Prosecutor and Defendant. The prosecutor's job is to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. In a Civil Trial, you have a Plaintiff and a Defendant. The plaintiff's jog is to present the preponderance of the evidence. Both can be jury trials. The bar is lower for the defendant in the Criminal trial. He can demand a jury trial and get it in most situations. Beyond a reasonable doubt means almost certain. Preponderance of evidence means the evidence on the side of the plaintiff is a whole lot stronger than that on the side of the defendant. Still, what a jury will decide and award one party is frequently simply a guess. It can differ quit a bit from theory.
You are not guaranteed that right except in court.