0
One of the most brilliant pupils of Thomas Eakins was William Glackens. He was a key figure in the Ashcan School, known for his depictions of urban life and vibrant scenes. Glackens' work reflected the influence of Eakins' emphasis on realism and the human form, which helped shape his artistic style and perspective.
What else can I help you with?
What is the comparative and superlative of the word brilliant?
more brilliant, most brilliant
What are the comparative and superlative of the word brilliant?
more brilliant, most brilliant
What is the comparative or superlative for brilliant?
Oh, dude, I got you! So, the comparative form of "brilliant" is "more brilliant," and the superlative form is "most brilliant." Like, if someone says your joke is hilarious, they probably mean it's the most brilliant thing they've heard all day. Keep being your witty self, my friend!
What is the ekaterina?
The people in the ekaterina branch are the most brilliant Cahills. They are related to people like Thomas Edison, Albert einstein, Isaac Newton etc.
What is the superlative form of brilliant?
most brilliant
Do Emperor Penguins have Square Pupils?
No, Emperor Penguins do not have square pupils. Their pupils are round like those of most other birds. Square pupils are more commonly found in species such as goats and octopuses.
What is the most brilliant in the sky?
sun
Which sets of encyclopedia are most often used by pupils?
no
Who is the most brilliant human being in the world?
its me.
Who is the most brilliant singer?
jessie j
What school has the most pupils?
Wolverhampton girls high school.
Which comparison is correct and logical The moon is the most brilliant object in the sky. The moon is the more brilliant object in the sky. The moon is the brilliant object in the sky.?
The correct and logical comparison is "The moon is the most brilliant object in the sky." This phrase indicates that the moon stands out among all objects in the sky as the brightest. The other options, "the more brilliant object" and "the brilliant object," lack proper context for comparison and clarity.
