All scavengers eat, it's part of the definition of the word. But not all things that eat are scavengers. Predators aren't scavengers, but they are consumers. Scavengers actually can not exist without primary consumers to scavenge off of.
True
Not all scavengers eat meat; some are herbivores and others, like flies, don't even have teeth at all. However, many carnivorous scavengers have sharp teeth like other carnivores that are designed for ripping and tearing flesh.
The Amazon Rainforest is full of animals that all contribute to the area's ecosystem. The rainforest has primary consumers that eat the plant life. These consumers are eaten by secondary consumers, or carnivores. When the carnivores die, they are consumed by scavengers and decomposers, Then, the cycle begins again.
If there were no scavengers then all the dead animals would rot .
Scavengers like vultures, komodo dragons, cichlids, foxes, hyenas, maggots, ants & humans. Every Class of the animal kingdom has a scavenger of some sort and many types of animals will become scavengers when food sources dwindle.
true
True
true
consumers
as far as i know any scavenger will eat a dead pig, scavengers generally eat anything they have strong stomachs after all its what they are designed for.
then the scavenger could decrease and would not be able to eat and they would die
all I know is that there are lots of plants in the savanna and also lots of animals!
Yes, a dragonfly is scientifically a scavenger. Some people say that they are not but I have studied dragonflies and all of my partners that also study dragonflies say that dragonflies are a scavenger.
true because secondary consumers eat plant eaters which are the predators.
no
Some consumers could be considered to be 'picky eaters'... they only want to eat food that they themselves have killed. And of course, other consumers may be herbivores that would nevereat meat at all...
chickens are consumers plants are producers trust me this is true ( animals and humans are all consumers)