Exactly what part about it is wrong? The mass-energy equivalence is widely accepted in modern physics. What is wrong is the popular explanation that "mass is converted to energy" in a nuclear reaction. In fact, both mass and energy are conserved in this case.
If you consider mass and energy to be equivalent and interchangeable, it does not conflict with the law of conservation of energy. E=mc2 states that energy is mass and mass is energy, so it does not disprove the law of conservation of energy.
gay\
I assume you mean e = m time c squared. "e" is energy; "m" is the mass; "c" is the speed of light.
The equivalence of mass and energy is one of the implications that arise from General Relativity.
Mass is directly proportional to momentum since momentum is the product of mass and velocity.
If you consider mass and energy to be equivalent and interchangeable, it does not conflict with the law of conservation of energy. E=mc2 states that energy is mass and mass is energy, so it does not disprove the law of conservation of energy.
E=mc^2 states that mass and energy are interchangeable, and that a little bit of mass creates a lot of energy.
No. Energy, mass and light-speed, none of which involve pi.
E=mc2 E= energy M= mass C= speed of light 2= squared
This equation shows an equivalence between mass and energy. What this means in practice is that any time the energy of an object increases, its mass will also increase. This is like saying that "energy has a mass". On the other hand, mass can be considered as a special type of energy.
In the energy because of Einsteins equation: E=mc^2. In a chemical change, mass is converted to energy because of the loss in strong forces and weak forces in molecules.
Einsteins theory of relativity can answer this. The equation is E=mC^2. This reads e equals m c squared. E is energy, m is mass and every object that has mass has a gravitational pull.
The idea is not that energy 'has' mass. The idea is that mass and energy can be directly related to one another in an equation. Also, mass does not always have weight; you can weigh a mass only when the mass is in a gravitational field. Having lots of 'energy' has no affect on your weight. The above stated answer is partly wrong because Einsteins E=MC2 equation qualitatively states that energy in reality does have mass. It is only that the speed of light is so great in term's of numerical value that any change in energy would not effectively affect your total mass. However weight is simply a force so you can not say that if my mass increases on earth i would have the same weight as on the moon for the same weight.
In Einsteins equation, E mc2, E is energy, m is mass, and c is the speed of light
this one i know by heart... hediscovered the theory of realitivity and the mass energy equivalence like e=mc2
Matter can be created from energy, and vice versa. When condensing matter from energy, that energy is stored in the mass, which can later be converted back into energy. Derived from Einsteins equation, the conversion is m=E/c^2. Conversion of a matter anti-matter reaction is 100% efficient.
gay\