answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Simple. The League of Nations (LON) has simply lack of 2 powerful nations at that point of time with no much colonies to deal with. They are namely the US and the USSR. The Britain and France were simply self-minded that they were busy on their colonies who were requesting for independence across the world. So they would like to see less problems worldwide by the Appeasement Policy to Hitler. (Churchill-, The Ex-Prime Minister of UK, simply thought that Adolf Hitler IS a trusted man, or rather a man who keeps to his promise.) Furthermore, both nations (UK&France) feel that this treaty is simply too extreme. (This treaty makes Germany lost some land with natural resource such as oil into the LON to take care for 15 years,then a vote was organized and the majority German voted for the return to the motherland,Germany instead of allowing LON or France to rule while Germany is needed to pay hundred billions to the Allies. So, at last, the Germans did not paid this huge sum of money. The treaty had made Germans lost all their pride and made their economy on the lowest point ever. High-unemployment and hyper-inflation,which an egg can cost millions of marks was not solved until Hitler rules the nation.)

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

They were afraid to go to war again, and would only do so if the League of Nations thought it would become the only solution. They would rather negotiate than cause more blood shed. Even though it was apparent that Germany wasn't concerned about more blood shed.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

If I'm not mistaken, it was to appease Germany, not create further hostility, because they didn't want another world war.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

France put up a fight, but lost and was occupied by Germany for a time. Hitler was the leader of Germany; he couldn't invade his own country.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Interfering would have guaranteed another World War and both countries were very determined to avoid that at the time.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why did Britain and France do nothing about Germany's violation of the treaty of Versailles?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What did Hitler add to the treaty of Versailles?

nothing


What did India get from the treaty of Versailles?

India got nothing from the treaty.


Is there a violation when a basketball player retrieves the ball after a field goal try that hits nothing?

There is no violation. It is the same as a pass


What did the League of Nations plan to do to stop aggressors countries?

The action they took against the aggressor was being afraid from Europe and Germanys colonies


Why were some Japanese leaders resentful of the peace treaty at Versailles?

Japan had nothing to do with the treaty.


Was Hitler a persuasive public speaker?

He was extremely persuasive. Through rhetoric and promises, he managed to come from nothing to rule a country. He had many many people behind him because of his promises of returning glory to the German people and righting the wrongs that had been done to them after WWI.


Why were some Japanese leaders resentful of the peace of Versailles?

Japan had nothing to do with the treaty.


Why were some of the Japanese resentful of the peace treaty at Versailles?

Japan had nothing to do with the treaty.


Why were the Japanese leaders resentful of the peace treaty at Versailles?

Japan had nothing to do with the treaty.


What did Italy get from the Treaty of Versailles?

Nothing, because they joined the allies in such a late stage of the war


Why were some Japaneses leaders resentful of the the peace treaty of Versailles?

Japan had nothing to do with the treaty.


Why were some Japanese leaders resentful of peace treaty at Versailles?

Japan had nothing to do with the treaty.