With properly designed drivers, there should never be a discrepancy, for better or for worse, between networking speeds between two operating systems.
I think yes because its more faster than Windows Vista.
no it needs to be about 75-85 mph and over for windows to break...big windows break faster than smaller windows.
Because Windows is a memory hog.
because it is so much better then the previous versions of windows both graphically and in performance. its faster and smarter than the previous versions of windows
Well look how much fancy graphics it has and if you upgraded to windows 7 from xp then your computer was probably built for xp not windows 7. But my computer is faster with windows 7...
This is a common occurrence, particularly if you did not upgrade the computer beforehand. Windows XP requires more RAM and a faster processor than Windows 98.
Because windows 7 has stablity updates the same as windows vista dose, windows xp uses unsupported service packs. as service pack 3 is now out.
Much better, safer, and faster than Windows.
yes its brilliant its really fast its awesome it is much faster than the other windows i have it and its brilliant and you should get a Sony vaio with it.
Pretty much everything is faster in Linux than in Windows. The Windows programmers need to prove to their bosses that they are doing the right thing, but the Linux programmers only need to prove to their peers that they are doing the right thing when they make improvements. Linux has things like zero-copy networking, which are not widely implemented in the Windows kernel(s).
yes
Generally, Windows 7 is faster than Windows Vista. This is partly through a process of analysis of code to look for bottlenecks between Vista and 7 and improved memory management of screen Windows in 7.