Humans have to carry all of their weight upright and on just two legs. Animals that have four legs to support their weight and their pelvic bones are less massive. We "pay" for this as we are more prone to fractures and other problems of the upper leg bones.
See link for more information:
The pelvic bones of a two-legged animal such as a human have to carry his whole weight, divided by two. A four-legged animal such as a pig divides its weight over four legs, so each leg and each pelvic bone has to bear only a fourth of the animal's weight. As the strain on the bones is a half than in the two-legged case, the bones can be less massive.
a four legged animal's pelvis doesn't have to support as much weight
Because the pelvis of the animal does not support the entire weight of the body like the one of a human
because animal are different from a human HOW?human bone are longer than a animal bone they has lot of bone than an animal
I guess is because the weight of the body distributes equally in four parts meanwhile humans have to equally distribute their weight in two which requires stronger and denser bones
because the body weight is spread out over four legs instead of two
The size of the pelvic bone is any species will depend on its overall size. With that in mind, there will be some animals with smaller and others with larger pelvic bones than humans.
4 legs = less pressure
Snakes have pelvic bones for the same reason we have tail bones. Evolution. At some point in the history of life, snakes had legs and humans had tails.
To hold the weight of the upper body and to stand the pressure of the lower half
Hip refers to the area of the pelvic bone. It can also refer to the area beside the pelvic bones.
There are two pelvic bones in human body. Each is made of union of three bones. It means Pubis or Pubic bone, Ischium bone and Ileac bone. Both bones are united in front side by cartilagenous joint called as pubic symphysis. On back side, you have Sacrum bone to form Pelvic Girdle.
The shape of the pelvic bones and the frontal bones differ.
Pelvic
Fish do not have "pelvic girdles" per se. Land animals in large majority have skeletal structures in their hips known as pelvic bones. In humans, men have a narrow pelvic size and women have a wider pelvic size. This is because women bear babies. The circular shape of these pelvic bones are referred to as the "pelvic girdle". Fish, however, don't have hip bones. Living in the water has eliminated the need for the extra physical support those bones would give during pregnancy. Since fish range in size from near-microscopic up to the immense whale shark, the equivalent to the pelvic area would vary greatly in size. Mammals too, range widely in size so comparison is difficult without a more specific question.
The pelvic bones, or "hip bones" are also called the innominates, the OS coxae or the pelvis.
If you mean pelvic bones then yes, they can.
Snakes have pelvic bones for the same reason we have tail bones. Evolution. At some point in the history of life, snakes had legs and humans had tails.
yes
Ilium and ischium
An appendicular skeleton is composed of 126 bones of the appendages, and pectoral and pelvic girdles.
Pelvic size generally correlates with the size of the animal and varies with the structure of the animal and how it uses it's limbs for locomotion. The size, structure and orientation of a bipedal animal's pelvis is allows for vertical attachments of the bones and muscles of the legs...
The pelvic bones (the ilium and the ischium).
Mainly the pelvic bones.