Yes, homologous structures have common bone and muscle structures suggesting that they came from an common ancestor while analogous structures do not share any similarity in features, suggesting that they derived from two separate origins.
pickles :3
An analogy is a trait or an organ that appears similar in two unrelated organisms
Saber-toothed cats were carnivores and ferocious hunters. They ate mammals and killed by laying on their prey until it died. Then, it used its sharp saber teeth to pierce the neck and eat the meat.
My spidey senses are telling me to tell you to look in your book.
Analogous structures are features of two different species that are similar in how the function, but the structure of the two features is different. The wings of an insect and the wings of a bird are analogous structures.
They don't. Homologous structures provide evidence for evolution not analogous structures.
Similar structures that have evolved independently are called homologous structures. An example would be the wings of a bird and the wings of an insect.
Yes, homologous structures have common bone and muscle structures suggesting that they came from an common ancestor while analogous structures do not share any similarity in features, suggesting that they derived from two separate origins.
Similar structures that evolved independently are called analogous structures, or analogies.
no
Roots
They are different because homologous structures have the same structure, but serve a different function. Like mammal arms(human, bat and whales). Analogous structues are different structures, but serve the same function. For example, bat wings and butterfly wings.
Scientists speculate that the saber toothed tiger was analogous to the lion and his pride. Therefore, saber toothed tiger cubs were raised in a pride with all adults sharing the raising of the cubs.
Structures
Homologous = same origin, different function (arms vs. wings) Analogous = same function, different origin (panda thumb)
The Kravic's cycle