I suppose its because people like petite things. Babies are small, and we find them cuter than say elephants... If you do psychology this is all about the "babyface hypothesis"
Good question though
Well it is up to you.But if i had to choose a small book because it is small but also a big giant book because it is cool
It depends on the mass. The higher the mass the higher the gravitational force. Usually big things have higher masses than small things so the answer is yes, big things (usually) have a higher gravitational force than small things.
yes
You have a false premise. Not ALL big things have bigger air resistance than small things. Air resistance must also factor in the direction of movement and the surface area against which the air is impacting, i.e., the shape of the objects.
So the ecosystem can be balanced, small things eat tiny things, big things eat small things, and huge things eat big things. If tiny things didn't exist in ponds, small things would not have anything to eat then the small things would die then the big things would not have anything to eat and die, then the huge things would have nothing to eat and die, then humans would not have meat to eat and become weak and limp.
rug rug if small dog or woof woof if big dog
No.You should find how much it can attract other things.
Carlos pena is way more handsome than Justin bieber and carlos is in big time rush
Neither. It is "Great things can come in small packages."
Maybe you mean: Good things come in small packages Don't know where it came from but it is said to emphasize that something does not need to be big in order to be good Or maybe - Big things come from small beginnings
If you like big balls of fluff, then Cheetah cubs. If you like things with comically enlarged ears in comparison to their face, Tiger cubs.
=The moral is tiny things can do big stuff or big things come in small packages.=