Greenhouse gases have many positive effects. Some of these are limiting the need for fossil fuels, making previously uninhabitable and unusable farmland useful, and increasing the yeild of certain crops.
There are many gases that can be considered monatomic gases. Some of these gases are helium, neon, argon, krypton, xenon and radon and all of those gases are considered noble gases.
some other words for greenhouses are:- * glasshouse * hothouse * conservatory * pavillion * vinery * orangery
Natural gases give us some energy
Reactions involving gases can negate the entropy of a system. However, certain gases can increase the rate of entropy. Thus, some gases are considered beneficial and others negative.
Generally group 18 is considered to contain non-reactive gases. But some compounds of xenon, krypton and radon are found.
It depends on where in Alaska. The soil around the town of Palmer is a very rich volcanic soil and grows very good crops. The only problem is the short season, though some folks grow some things in greenhouses.
Yes, in a way. The gases in the atmosphere hold back some of the heat from the sun (not letting it escape back into space). This heat keeps the earth warm and lets us live fairly comfortably. If we continue to add greenhouses gases to the atmosphere (carbon dioxide pollution from vehicles, industry and power stations), and also continue cutting down trees (which soak up carbon dioxide) then the world will continue to get warmer.
Yes, greenhouses keep the heat in so that plants can grow more easily. A unheated greenhouse will only protect from frost to about 5 degrees below. To allow plants to grow some heating will be required.
the names of green house gases are :- water vapour carbon dioxide methane ozone Any gas with three or more atomes is considered a green house gas. Water vapor makes up about 80% of all green house gas.
The first scientist is considered Daniel Bernoulli, in 1738; but some ideas existed since antiquity.
Gases absorb radiation and some is absorbed in the atmosphere :)
How about: Resolved: that the cost of ameliorating greenhouse gases is not commensurate with the benefits.