It helps historians to remember to check other sources for facts.
bias is important because then it's easier the see how the people felt and possible ways to find answers
some amount of bias
bias
Biased reports then to not accurately describe what actually happened. That can result in a history that does not reflect the truth.
To judge the accounts against each other to see if there is bias (Apex)
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
Bias can be useful to historians by allowing them to learn about people's opinions and beliefs.
yes
Historians would be wise to look for bias in a source because bias can influence the way the writer relayed the information. Sources free from bias are to be the most trusted.
Historians need to be concerned about reports with bias because bias can distort the accuracy and objectivity of historical information. It can lead to incomplete or misleading interpretations of events, which can impact the overall understanding of the past. Historians strive to present a balanced and unbiased view of history to ensure the integrity of their research and analysis.
bias or primary
Everywhere! All historians are people, most if not all people are biased, therefore, most history is biased. Therefore, bias is everywhere and needs to be considered.
Historians Have To Be Careful Of Bias Because, If They Are Writting A Report About Something That Has Happened That Is Part Of History, They Might Use Bias Because They Want The Story To Be Remembered Or Famous In Some Way. But They Don't Want To Use Too Much Bias Because It May Not Be True !
biased
some amount of bias
If historians weren't biased there'd be no heated controversy to fuel book sales, and they'd die out.
some amount of bias
When the historian has no evidence to back up his theory