0
This is a misnomer. Scientists often and do prove their findings, particularly through repetition of an experiment. Scientists cannot prove a negative (reindeer can't fly), but can only prove such under specific conditions (these reindeer can't fly in March). Theories are not said to be proven until they can fully explain a set of conditions. Even then, parts of a theory can be proven, but the whole remains open to refinement.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agobecause they must allow for possibility that some thing exists that might disprove their hypothesis.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why might it be important for scientists to be able to communicate their methods and their findings?
Scientists first create an hypothesis. They develop methods to prove their hypothesis. In order for other scientists to replicate the findings and prove or disprove another scientist's outcome, the original scientist MUST describe the methods used and the findings.
Why do scientists publish their findings?
to help other scientists who are stuck on the same thing
How would is it important that scientists publish their findings?
Its important because other scientist can know what they're working on and if its accurate, or if they can improve their findings.
Scientists share their findings with the public. Many publish their work in .?
Scientific Journal
Why are scientific journals important to scientific progress?
They are a good way for scientists to share their findings. This allows for other scientists to do the same experiment and confirm or disprove those findings. It also allows scientists to use what has already been tested in their own studies that go beyond what was already proven.
Why might it be important for scientists to be able to communicate their methods and their findings?
Scientists first create an hypothesis. They develop methods to prove their hypothesis. In order for other scientists to replicate the findings and prove or disprove another scientist's outcome, the original scientist MUST describe the methods used and the findings.
What should be evaluated in science?
Science is the study of the physical and natural world. As such, an evaluation of the scientists findings should be conducted, and a critical opinion of the scientists findings are correct before a paper is published stating that their findings are correct. There is much that science has done to prove much that this world has to offer. However there is also much that cannot be proved by science, such as the old age question "Is there a God?"
What do the findings of archaeologists prove?
i dont now
Why do scientists publish their findings?
to help other scientists who are stuck on the same thing
How do scientists use technology to communicate their findings to other scientists?
by useing science
What should scientists do to be certain about t the conclusions of an experiment?
To document the findings or document that there were no findings or that they were in conclusive
How do scientists communicate their findings to other scientists in 1665?
In 1665 there was very little science as we know it, so there was not any "findings" . Those who did experiment and create wrote books.
What did Alfred Weneger try to prove?
Alfred Weneger was trying to prove his theory of Continental Drift. Many other scientists before him had the same theory, but they never could prove it. He had five pieces of evidence.
How would is it important that scientists publish their findings?
Its important because other scientist can know what they're working on and if its accurate, or if they can improve their findings.
Scientists share their findings with the public. Many publish their work in?
Scientific Journal
Scientists share their findings with the public. Many publish their work in .?
Scientific Journal
How did Alfred Wegener prove that pangaea existed?
truth is he couldn't prove it he tryed to show the scientists that the continents could have drifted but the scientists did NOT believe him
