0
This is a misnomer. Scientists often and do prove their findings, particularly through repetition of an experiment. Scientists cannot prove a negative (reindeer can't fly), but can only prove such under specific conditions (these reindeer can't fly in March). Theories are not said to be proven until they can fully explain a set of conditions. Even then, parts of a theory can be proven, but the whole remains open to refinement.
What else can I help you with?
Why might it be important for scientists to be able to communicate their methods and their findings?
Scientists first create an hypothesis. They develop methods to prove their hypothesis. In order for other scientists to replicate the findings and prove or disprove another scientist's outcome, the original scientist MUST describe the methods used and the findings.
What is the possessive noun for scientists?
The possessive noun for "scientists" is "scientists'." This indicates that something belongs to a group of scientists. For example, "the scientists' research findings" shows that the research findings belong to the scientists.
Scientists share their findings with the public. Many publish their work in .?
Scientific Journal
Why do scientists publish their findings?
Scientists publish their findings to share their research with the scientific community, advance knowledge in their field, and contribute to the overall progress of science. Publication also allows other scientists to review, critique, and build upon the work, promoting a transparent and collaborative research environment.
How would is it important that scientists publish their findings?
It is important for scientists to publish their findings to share knowledge with the scientific community, validate their research through peer review, and contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge. Publishing also allows for transparency and reproducibility of research.
Why might it be important for scientists to be able to communicate their methods and their findings?
Scientists first create an hypothesis. They develop methods to prove their hypothesis. In order for other scientists to replicate the findings and prove or disprove another scientist's outcome, the original scientist MUST describe the methods used and the findings.
What should be evaluated in science?
Science is the study of the physical and natural world. As such, an evaluation of the scientists findings should be conducted, and a critical opinion of the scientists findings are correct before a paper is published stating that their findings are correct. There is much that science has done to prove much that this world has to offer. However there is also much that cannot be proved by science, such as the old age question "Is there a God?"
What do the findings of archaeologists prove?
i dont now
What is the possessive noun for scientists?
The possessive noun for "scientists" is "scientists'." This indicates that something belongs to a group of scientists. For example, "the scientists' research findings" shows that the research findings belong to the scientists.
How do scientists use technology to communicate their findings to other scientists?
by useing science
What did Alfred Weneger try to prove?
Alfred Weneger was trying to prove his theory of Continental Drift. Many other scientists before him had the same theory, but they never could prove it. He had five pieces of evidence.
What should scientists do to be certain about t the conclusions of an experiment?
To document the findings or document that there were no findings or that they were in conclusive
What happens if scientist cannot duplicate a method and prove it?
If scientists cannot duplicate a method and prove it, it calls into question the reliability and validity of the original findings. Reproducibility is a key tenet of the scientific method, and failure to replicate results suggests that the initial findings may not be accurate or robust. This could prompt further investigation, refinement of the method, or potentially a reevaluation of the original conclusions.
What happens is scientists cannot duplicate a method and prove it?
If scientists cannot duplicate a method and prove it, it could indicate that the original results may have been an anomaly or that there are limitations or errors in the method itself. This highlights the importance of reproducibility in scientific research to ensure the accuracy and reliability of findings. Scientists may need to re-evaluate the method, seek alternative explanations, or collaborate with other researchers to verify the results.
How do scientists communicate their findings to other scientists in 1665?
In 1665 there was very little science as we know it, so there was not any "findings" . Those who did experiment and create wrote books.
Give 2 ways that scientists share the findings of their research with drugs?
Scientists typically share the findings of their research on drugs through scientific publications in journals and presentations at conferences. They may also communicate their findings with the public through press releases or media interviews.
What are scientists main goal?
To prove they exist
