According to Joshua, Jericho was the first city to be conquered in order to allow access to the promised land. Also, it was an important location for the local religions, and so the destruction would have been a psychological attack on the region as well.
From a biblical point of view, Joshua attacked Jericho because it was a highly fortified city that stood in his way of the conquest of all Canaan. On the other hand, archaeologists say that the city of Jericho did not even exist in the Late Bronze Age - the time when Joshua is supposed to have invaded Canaan. So, on the scholarly view, Joshua did not attack Jericho at all - this was a story that developed many centuries after the legendary event.
According to Joshua 6:24 - Then they burned the whole city and everything in it, . . . So the answer would be; "Joshua and his men burned the king of Jericho!
Joshua Chapter 6
One of the most famous episodes in the biblical conquest of Canaan was the assault on the city of Jericho. Joshua had the priests march around the city walls and Yahweh caused the walls to collapse, allowing the Hebrews to storm the city. However, we now know from archaeologists that there was no city at Jericho at that time.As a prelude to the attack on the city, Joshua sent two spies, who found refuge with the harlot, Rahab, who in turn made a covenant to be spared when the attackers slaughtered her fellow citizens (Joshua chapter 2). Now, even if there really had been an assault on Jericho, this is an improbable story, since the spies risked their lives but provided no information of value and were unlikely to do so. But there was no Jericho, so there were no spies and no harlot - the spy story just did not happen and we can only surmise how it arose.An early Semitic deity was named Rahab, and we know that this deity found its way into Hebrew folklore as a sea dragon that was defeated by Yahweh*. However, these allusions are too dissimilar to the innkeeper/harlot of Joshua. Perhaps the simplest answer could lie in that the name Rahab (or Rachab) is very similar to the Hebrew verb rāhab, generally translated as either 'to beset, storm or assault,' or 'to be proud/arrogant'. If Joshua was about to storm or assault Jericho, would this have given rise to the fictional harlot's name, Rahab?Footnote*For example Isaiah 51:9 and Psalms 89:9-10, with indirect references at Ezekiel 29:3, Ezekiel 32:2 and Psalms 87:4.AnswerRahab was an actual woman who lived in Jericho. The presence of scarlet thread in her home suggests she was involved in making or dyeing of cloth. She hid Joshua's spies among the flax on the rooftop, thus saving their lives. They promised to spare her life in return, and she was to mark her house with thread of scarlet as a sign. She later became the mother of Boaz, who was Jesse's grandfather - the line which eventually included Christ.A:Rahab was the harlot who, in the Book of Joshua, aided the spies whom Joshua sent into Jericho before his assault on the city of Jericho. Rahab made a covenant to be spared when the attackers slaughtered her fellow citizens. Now, even if there really had been an assault on Jericho, this is an improbable story, since the spies provided no information of value, and were unlikely to do so. But archaeologists tell us there was no Jericho, so there were no spies and no harlot - the spy story just did not happen and we can only surmise how it arose. The simplest answer could lie in that the name Rahab (or Rachab) is very similar to the Hebrew verb rāhab, generally translated as either 'to beset, storm or assault,' or 'to be proud/arrogant'. If Joshua was about to storm or assaultJericho, this could have given rise to the fictional harlot's name, Rahab.
According to 1 Kings 6:1 it would have been about 1400BC, since we can date fairly closely the date of the temple of Solomon.
As the Israelites left Egypt on their exodus, Joshua was one of the twelve spies sent by Moses to reconnoiter the land of Canaan. Joshua and Caleb were the only two who had confidence that God would give Israel the land of Canaan despite its formidable inhabitants. Because of their faith God allowed Joshua and Caleb to enter the promised land, but he vowed that the others of Joshua's generation would die in the wilderness. God instructed Moses to designate Joshua as his successor. Joshua led the Israelites into the promised land. The book of Joshua recounts his victories at Jericho, Ai, and other places.
It means: Joshua fought in the battle of Jericho.
According to Joshua 6:24 - Then they burned the whole city and everything in it, . . . So the answer would be; "Joshua and his men burned the king of Jericho!
Joshua.
Joshua
The town of Jericho was taken in the military campaign led by Joshua, in the Battle of Jericho described in the Book of Joshua in the Bible. It is known for its miraculous conquest where the walls of Jericho fell down after the Israelites marched around the city seven times blowing trumpets.
Joshua
joshua
Joshua (fought the battle of Jericho)
Canaanites.
Archaeologists say that there was no city of Jericho during the Late Bronze Age, when Joshua is claimed to have conquered it. And if there was no city, there can have been no king of Jericho.AnswerIt is not currently known who the king of Jericho was at that time.
In archaic English, "Fit" is the past participle of "fight". So, it is kind of like saying: "Joshua Fought The Battle of Jericho."
The story of the Battle of Jericho is found in the book of Joshua in the Bible, specifically in Joshua 6. It is described in one chapter.