American leaders did not give the new central government greater powers, because they didn't want the government to take full control over the US, just like Great Britain had done.
Leaders may have been hesitant to give the new central government greater powers because they wanted to prevent the concentration of power in one entity and ensure a system of checks and balances. They may have also been concerned about preserving the autonomy and authority of individual states or regions. Additionally, leaders may have been influenced by the fear of creating a government that could potentially become oppressive or tyrannical.
i dont no i need the answer
In a unitary form of government, all powers are held by a central government. This type of government is characterized by a strong central authority that delegates limited powers to subnational entities.
In a unitary government, all powers are held by a central government.
Concurrent powers
Madison justified the new central government envisioned in the Constitution by stating that the separation of government into three powers would check the powers. He believed that if the government abused it's powers, the citizens had the right to revolt and overturn the government.
Federalism.
In a unitary government, all powers are concentrated in one central authority while in a federal government powers are distributed between the central and state governments. Both of them enjoy coordinate powers.
It is a government in which all powers held by the government belong to a central agency.
They are concentrated under a central level in a unitary government.
local level
A confederation is a form of government where power is concentrated at the regional or provincial level at the central government has very weak and limited powers
A confederation is a form of government where power is concentrated at the regional or provincial level at the central government has very weak and limited powers