The Romans did not have three branches of government. This is a modern concept.
they wanted to have the choice to govern themselves.
The Romans formed a republic in order to allow them to rule themselves and not have to take orders from one individual. In their method of self rule, the Romans restricted the length of time a man held political office and also restricted the length of time he had to wait before he could serve again.
It tells us that the Romans fancied having Trojan origins
Montesquieu
well, see, it didnt. it was a good idea at first. but then the Romans where spending to much time having fun insted of working. that also led to the fall of rome
No, he just believed in having checks and balances within the government.
People should be able to choose their leaders, instead of having the leader chosen by war, or hereditary. People should be able to govern themselves.
they wanted to have the choice to govern themselves.
They can put themselves further into debt for political gain and because of the checks and balances system it makes it hard to get things for other branches
the idea that people with a shared culture should be able to govern themselves
it keeps each group from having to much power
The Romans formed a republic in order to allow them to rule themselves and not have to take orders from one individual. In their method of self rule, the Romans restricted the length of time a man held political office and also restricted the length of time he had to wait before he could serve again.
For having a poo on the loo
Bicameral is having two branches. Also it can have to chambers.
Having sex and masturbation
2 branches. 1 is Mindspace, hi-tech city 2 is rayadurgam
It tells us that the Romans fancied having Trojan origins