they believed the black race to be inferior to theirs.
Some of the least prosperous non-slave-holding whites were scorned as "poor white trash"; known also as "hillbillies," they were often described as listless, shiftless, and misshapen-many were not lazy however, but sick and suffered from malnutrition and parasites.All these whites without slaves had no direct stake in the preservation of slavery, yet they were among the stoutest defenders of the slave system that existed in the South.There was the hope of buying a slave or two and parlaying their paltry holdings into riches-all in accord with the "American dream" of upward social mobility.They took pride in their presumed racial superiority, which would be watered if the slaves were freed; many of the poorer whites were not economically much better off.
The southern economy was heavily dependent on agriculture, particularly cotton production which relied on slave labor. Additionally, the southern social structure was built around slavery, leading to cultural and political acceptance of the institution. In contrast, the northern economy was more industrialized and did not rely as heavily on slave labor, resulting in less support for slavery.
The spread of slavery in the South was driven by economic factors, as slavery was deeply ingrained in the plantation-based agricultural economy. The demand for labor in industries like cotton production led to the expansion of slavery. Additionally, social and cultural beliefs that supported slavery as a way of life also played a role in its spread.
Some southerners supported slavery because it was central to their economy, providing cheap labor for plantations and agriculture. Additionally, there was a belief in white supremacy that justified the enslavement of black people. Social norms and traditions further reinforced the acceptance of slavery in the South.
Yes this is true slaves where very common in North and south Carolina and this was because they need more people to help with the rice crops because,the people of that time did not know how to even plant rice. Silly people : )
Mostly because of slavery torwards the black people and the whites did not like the color of blacks so they took action.
Yes! Of course!
Support for slavery per se never really "hardened" among Southerners. Most people didn't own any slaves and regarded the whole institution as rather dubious. However the word "slavery" came to be used as a kind of shorthand to denote protection of life, liberty and property. The radical Abolitionists of the North liked to say they would kill all the Southerners, and this alarmed the people of the South and led to secession.
White people in South those for slavery or states in the Confederacy.
The Impending Crisis of the South by Hinton R. Helper
Protests from the local people led to the whites delcaring the union of South Africa. Protests from the local people led to the whites delcaring the union of South Africa.
Depends on the time period. Most people in the north started to believe that slavery was unneeded, and eventually that it was wrong. Many people in the south believed the same thing, but they also had a lot of land they had to care for. And some on both sides believed it was their right.
Black people had a lot more to be miserable about back in the days of slavery, but all people would have been happy or miserable in similar proportions to today: times change but people - human nature - stays the same.Opion:Why would the whites be miserable? They were the ones who had the blacks doing everything for them.Opposing Opinion:Actually, not all whites were slave owners. Although it was the minority opinion back then and most would have been fearful to speak out, there was still white support for abolition in the South where slavery was prevalent.Another View: Blacks were not the only racial group subject to slavery and servitude.Look up the plight of indentured servants - the majority of whom were white - and who were instrumental in the settlement of both (what would become) the US, as well as other nations.
The north didn't have slavery, but did have discrimination. The south did have active overt slavery where people were considered property.
Yes because north Carolina and south carolina used to be one state but when tennsions started growing between the north and south they split so south Carolina was part of the south that supported slavery
The South wanted more control of their own states. Lincoln did not support this. Also, the South supported slavery, and Lincoln didn't.
The south did not support the newly formed Republican Party because ,the party wanted to end slavery. The south used a great deal of slave labor to cultivate crops like cotton.