economic and emotional burdens following World War I
It doesn't. Many fascist and illiberal regimes have market economies.
It allowed the leadership of affected countries to take aggressive actions against other countries without the input from the people of those affected countries. And because the countries with totalitarian regimes were run from the top down, the people in those countries could not object to the leadership's actions.
what was the major difference between the totalitarian regimes in the soviet union and thoes in italy and germany
Many countries needed the military's help to recover after World War I which led to the rise of totalitarian regimes. The Great Depression left countries vulnerable to dictators. Many Europeans lost faith in their democratic governments. The Great Depression led countries to support new leaders, some of whom were totalitarians.
One could argue that it was a good thing that Japan attacked Pearl Harbor because if they had not done so, the US might never have entered WW II and as a result, it is possible that the fascist powers of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan would not have been defeated, and might exist even today, in 2013, continuing to do tremendous harm to the world with their oppressive and racist regimes.
economic and emotional burdens following World War I.
General Franco was a Fascist, and so were the regimes of Italy and Germany.
General Franco was a Fascist, and so were the regimes of Italy and Germany.
During World War II, Eastern Europe was primarily under the control of three types of government: fascist, communist, and collaborationist regimes. Fascist governments, such as Nazi Germany and fascist Italy, occupied and controlled countries like Poland, Hungary, and Romania. Communist governments, led by the Soviet Union, emerged in Eastern European countries like Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Bulgaria. Collaborationist regimes were also established in countries like Croatia and Slovakia, which cooperated with the Axis powers.
Francisco Franco ruled Spain as a military dictatorship from 1939 until 1975. He was an ally of the fascist regimes in Germany and Italy.
Most fascist regimes were Roman Catholic, including the Franco regime.
. A form of government: a fascist regimeA Regime is a group which is in power.
Italy was the first Fascist state in Europe, with Mussolini seizing power in 1922. Hitler's Germany is the most infamous of the fascist states, but along with Italy these powers did not last beyond WWII. Spain and Portugal also fell to Fascism in the 1930's, with the regimes lasting into the 1970s.Additionally, a puppet Fascist state existed in wartime Croatia and in Vichy France, and sympathetic Fascist leaders/individuals were active in perpetrating the Holocaust across Ukraine and the Baltic states.
Italy only. Therefore the question should be re-phrased to 'country'. The term fascist in the anglo-saxon culture is wrongly (like the rest of history) interpreted and taught. Fascism was the political ideal of Italy's Mussolini in Italy during the period from 1922 to 1945 and still followed nowaday by young and old. Fascism stands for an ideal of life and country against capitalism and communism. *Fascism: a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. Only in Italy was the controlling political party given this name, but by this definition, Nazi Germany and WW2-era Japan were even more Fascist than Italy.
you got study island too? the answer is it had complete control over the country's activities :)
Yes india, Pakistan and Bangladesh willl come under PAX INDICA after WWIII extinguishes Islamic regimes in the same manner fascist regimes disappeared after WWII
It doesn't. Many fascist and illiberal regimes have market economies.