0
Why do archaeologists sometimes disagree about how to interpret archaeological evidence?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Because they poo
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Archaeologists may disagree about interpreting archaeological evidence due to several reasons. Firstly, interpretation often relies on fragmentary and incomplete evidence, leading to multiple plausible interpretations. Secondly, archaeologists have differing theoretical perspectives, which can influence their interpretations. Lastly, biases, personal perspectives, and subjective opinions can also contribute to disagreements among archaeologists when interpreting the past.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What do Biblical Archaeologist say about Israel Finkelstein and why?
Biblical archaeologists have varying opinions about Israel Finkelstein. Some support his theories and methods, which emphasize a more critical and scientific approach to interpreting archaeological findings related to the Bible. Others may disagree with his conclusions or interpretations, particularly those that challenge traditional views or historical timelines. Overall, Finkelstein's work has stimulated important discussions and debates within the field of biblical archaeology.
Where is the patron saint of the Abbey of Saint Peter and Saint Paul buried?
This depends as you could be talking about either St. Peter or St. Paul, both of whom are believed to be buried in Rome. St. Peter, by tradition, is buried under the main altar of St. Peter's Basilica in Rome, where the Holy Pontiff celebrates Solemn Mass, and St. Paul is said, as of only about a decade ago, to be buried under the main altar of St. Paul Outside the Walls, also in Rome.Sidenote- some may disagree that Rome, which I speak of as including Vatican City, is not actually Vatican City. This is true.
How many people did it take to make one of the pyramids in Egypt?
It is estimated that tens of thousands of workers were involved in the construction of the pyramids in Egypt. The exact number of people may vary depending on the size and complexity of the pyramid, as well as the time period in which it was built.
Is the phrase disagree to grammatically correct?
No, not exactly, although you would be understood. In conversational English, we disagree "with" something or someone. Or we have a disagreement "about" something. So, "I love my best friend, but I sometimes disagree with her about politics." Or, "Sometimes my best friend and I have a disagreement about politics."
How did the Supreme Court unite the US?
It's job is not to unite, but to interpret law to see if it is constitutional. There will always be people who agree or disagree with its decisions.
Did the Trojan War ever happen?
They did not find the remains of the long-storied horse, but recently archaeologists have found remains of a war near present day troy and the Greek city-states supposed to be involved. So many archaeologists think it did happen. Others though disagree.
If two people disagree it is important to prove who is right and who is wrong?
It may be more beneficial to focus on understanding each other's perspectives and finding common ground rather than proving right or wrong. Communication, active listening, and compromise can help resolve conflicts and foster better relationships.
Can the Vaticans decide what goes in the bible?
No. However, they can change the way it is interpreted. I disagree, my friend. They can change the way CATHOLICS interpret the Bible, i think is what you mean?
When scientists evaluate an idea an disagree with it what do they sometimes do?
improvements of the idea
When is something an argument?
When two people or more disagree with each other and they express their opinions. Sometimes the argument can be friendly and sometimes unfriendly.
How would a rabbi and a priest interpret the claim that Jesus is the incarnation of God?
Unless the rabbi was a Messianic Jew he would disagree. A Catholic priest would agree with the claim that Jesus was God.
Why is it sometimes uncomfortable to disagree with a friend?
If you respect each other and don't make the disagreement personal nothing will go wrong.
How may a dispute between Congress and the Executive branch be resolved when they disagree over an interpretation of Constitutional powers?
I think the Supreme Court would settle it, because it's the Judicial branch's job to interpret the Constitution.
Add a prefix to the word agree?
Disagree
Can all three branches of government interpret the constitution differently?
Absolutely. Even US Supreme Court justices disagree with each other's interpretation of the Constitution, which is why there are seldom unanimous votes.While the President and members of Congress may disagree with certain Supreme Court decisions, the justices are the final arbiters of the Constitution. The other branches of government must abide by the Court's opinions.
