Most biologists today consider viruses to be nonliving because viruses do not have all the characteristics essential for life. Viruses are not cells and do not use their own energy to grow or to respond to their surroundings. Viruses also cannot make food, take in food, or produce wastes. The only way in which viruses are like organisms is that they are able to multiply.
CREDITS FROM: North Carolina 8TH GRADE PRENTICE HALL SCIENCE EXPLORER
Most biologists agree that the difference between living and nonliving matter can be explained by looking at characteristics such as metabolism, growth, reproduction, response to stimuli, and development. Living organisms exhibit these characteristics, which nonliving matter lacks.
Viruses are generally considered nonliving because they cannot carry out essential life processes on their own, such as metabolism or reproduction. They require a host cell to replicate and carry out their life cycle.
Biologists determine whether a thing is living or nonliving by a list of characteristics. These characteristics include the ability to reproduce, the ability to eat, the ability to grow and the ability to excrete waste.
Viruses are often considered nonliving because they lack the ability to carry out essential life processes on their own, such as metabolism and growth. They can only replicate and infect host cells by hijacking the cellular machinery of the host.
Marine biologists study nonliving factors like water temperature, salinity, pH levels, and ocean currents to understand their impact on marine ecosystems. They also research nonliving structures like coral reefs, underwater geology, and ocean pollution to assess their effects on marine life.
Biologists consider dormant virions to be non-living because they must obtain a host to function and replicate themselves. However, active viruses are considered to be living, by most scientists.
None. Viruses are acellular. Many biologists do not consider viruses to be living things in part because they are acellular. Look at any phylogeny (tree of life). Viruses are not on them.
No, viruses are nonliving.
They are Different because Viruses are nonliving.
Most biologists agree that the difference between living and nonliving matter can be explained by looking at characteristics such as metabolism, growth, reproduction, response to stimuli, and development. Living organisms exhibit these characteristics, which nonliving matter lacks.
Since viruses are nonliving, they have no known predators.
If you mean what are viruses then they are nonliving strands Rna surrounded by a protein coat
None. They are nonliving organisms.
The type of cells that viruses live in are host cells. Viruses need host cells in order to reproduce or multiply.
If by non-living you mean an object such as a sheet of metal then no they are not composed of cells. If you are referring to something dead, then yes the DNA is still intact at least for a while anyway they do deteriorate in time.
Viruses are generally considered nonliving because they cannot carry out essential life processes on their own, such as metabolism or reproduction. They require a host cell to replicate and carry out their life cycle.
viruses are nonliving things. but they need living things to reproduces. so live