Real GDP reflects output more accurately than nominal GDP by using constant prices.
hy do economists use resl GDP rather than nominal GDP to gauge economic well-being?
Real GDP calculations have been adjusted to factor in inflation. Nominal GDP calculations are not adjusted. It is harder to make valid comparisons across time if you don't adjust for price level differences.
Economists use real GDP per capita rather than simply real GDP. This is because population growth is an important variable (per capita), and so, real GDP per capita is the more accurate measurement of the GDP.
No, nominal interest can never be a negative rate. If such an event occurred it would involve customers paying the banking, at which point it would be referred to as a fee rather than interest.
It doesn't. Rather, taxation removes capital from the private sector where all economic growth and development occur.
hy do economists use resl GDP rather than nominal GDP to gauge economic well-being?
Real GDP calculations have been adjusted to factor in inflation. Nominal GDP calculations are not adjusted. It is harder to make valid comparisons across time if you don't adjust for price level differences.
The population growth rate can measure how fast the population of a country can grow without engendering its declining living standards. Here we want to know the balance between growth rates in population compared to growth rates in economic output. By answering the question with the same wording as question gives us a rather "too late now" result. Here we'll most often find a disagreement among economists on how to avoid a decline before it happens.
Economists use real GDP per capita rather than simply real GDP. This is because population growth is an important variable (per capita), and so, real GDP per capita is the more accurate measurement of the GDP.
Yes, prepaid expenses should be a nominal account. Prepaid expenses are not assigned to a particular organization, but rather a category.
No, nominal interest can never be a negative rate. If such an event occurred it would involve customers paying the banking, at which point it would be referred to as a fee rather than interest.
Limiting factors is anything you can run out of. Exponential growth is just a form of geometric growth - growth by multiples rather than addition.
Yes, I can, but rather approximately.
he does not have to pay them. (although he does have to pay a nominal fee to the SS for them)
Aggressive growth funds seek to maximize capital gains, rather than current income
I would rather use Kg.
Newton, or (rather incorrectly) the kilogram.