Because it was a slow change, unlike the other version was a whole new evolved species.
Who was the first scientist to use the word cell : the first scientist is ROBERT HOOKE,, and he find it on 1663.
Because DNA can tell scientist who ur parents are and find out more about our body structure
Scientist must isolate and clone diseased genes in order to study them. A clone of the gene allows scientist to find an exact cure.
common characteristics
Robert Hooke was the first to use the name cell he was also the first scientist to find and discover cells heh i live up to my username :D
Because due to Darwins theory of evolution, fossils lead to adaptations over time therefor giving us reason to find evolution within human beings and animals.
Badly. The theory of evolution by natural selection has to do with the natural world and the selection of individual organisms. Social Darwinism and like ideologies are biologically mistaken as the posit a form of group selection which has nothing to do with evolutionary theory but everything to do with social ideology trying to find scientific respectability.
In that case, the theory - the laws or principles - have to be reviewed.
A theory models or explains why something is the way it is or how something works. If at some point a scientist find this theory to be inadequate (doesn't fully explain/describe it) due to recent research he/she may have done the theory will need to be modified to include the latest discoveries.
they work in there lab and find all the evidence they can get and then put all the clues together to make a theory
capriologists they study the whole world space, the layers everything so they would find theory of plate tectonics useful
Nope. They keep the theory the way it is. No one changes it. Usually, when scientist have tested the theory and find out something new, they create a new theory instead of changing the first one.
evidences against Darwin
Yes I did find his reasoning convincing because in his theory he use the paradox statement that if we did time travel we couldn't be born but then Again we would be and it would cycle back in the same state!? Also it would not be pokey to stop time and go to the past or present which most likey means the earth would rotate counterclockwise but even still we wouldn't get younger or older in sense of time travel.
No scientist found the Earth.
Theories are ideas, educatied ideas, but still only ideas. A scientist may change a scientific theory if new facts or information are found, if other scientists' review find errors, if attempts to apply the theory are unsuccessful, or if they see that the calculations are wrong when they double check them, and so then they would retest and rewrite their theory to correct the errors.Science is testing a belief with the means to disprove it and being unable to do so.Scientific Fact = something that has yet to be disproved.
scientist use sound