Charles Darwin developed the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection before most of the fossil evidence for the theory existed. He looked at the micro-evolution practised by pigeon breeders, the evidence on the Galapagos Islands and elsewhere, and realised that evolution was the only explanation that made sense. He saw that related species were to be found in close proximity, evidence of evolution from a single parent species, whereas a single act of Special Creation ought to have placed the species anywhere on the globe where the environment was suitable.
The fossil record shows clear evidence of evolution over a period of more than a billion years. Certainly, at first, there were no transitional species among the many species that had been found, although scientists saw much that did confirm the Theory of Evolution. That has changed, because many transitional species have been found. A recently discovered 220-million year old fossil, Odontochelys semitestacea, is a new species of turtle that had a fully formed shell on its underside, but only a small partial shell on its back, extending from its backbone. As well as a partial shell, Odontochelys semitestaceaalso had ribs that had begun to widen, thus demonstrating that the fully developed shell of later turtles evolved from the ribs of earlier species. Tiktaalik roseae is the name of a newly discovered lobe-finned fossil fish from the late Devonian period, that is a transitional form to amphibians, with basic wrist bones and simple fingers, as well as the robust ribcage necessitated by existence out of water. Odontochelys semitestacea and Tiktaalik roseae are two more pieces in the jigsaw that shows conclusively how life on Earth evolved from earlier species.
Scientists can now use DNA evidence from modern species to support the fossil record, as further evidence of evolution.
Probably in tidal pools.
Virtually all of the scientists in life-science related fields, and most of the rest.
Evolution is as logical as you can get. Supported by concrete evidence, corroborated by scientists worldwide, and put through the scientific method time and time again... it does not deviate into a subjective opinion. Those who don't believe the theory of evolution is logical clearly do not understand evolution.
The overwhelming majority of scientists accept the theory of evolution by natural selection. Any scientists that do not accept the theory usually do so for religious reasons.
micro evolution refers as evolution occurred during biochemical synthesis in primitive earth as for evolution of essential micro and bio molecules.
Scientists have believed that chemical evolution occurred about 4 billion years ago, shortly after the formation of the Earth. This process is thought to have led to the development of the first life forms on our planet.
Scientists believe that chemical evolution occurred around 3.5 billion years ago.
toyota supra and hayden copes hair duuuuuuuude
Probably in tidal pools.
Virtually all of the scientists in life-science related fields, and most of the rest.
Scientist believe that stellar evolution contained only hydrogen and then helium.
Different scientists hold different beliefs. Many scientists accept the theory of evolution as a scientific explanation for the diversity of life on Earth. However, there are also scientists who believe in theistic evolution, which posits that evolution is a process guided by a higher power, such as God. Ultimately, beliefs about the origins of humans vary among scientists.
No, they are fundamental to the process of evolution. Mass extinctions are less common.
No. Many theists, including Christians, believe that evolution occurred. Belief in some sort of god and belief in evolution are not mutually exclusive. Some even believe evolution was guided by some divine entity such as God.
The higher elements are forged in the center of stars. Most stars can create up to about element 6-8 on the periodic table, but any elements higher than that require a super nova.
because they think they are smart in past history
No, some actually profess faith even despite the truth. That is fine.