answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why do scientists try to repeat other scientists experiments?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General Science

What is it called when scientists do their experimental tests more than once so they can reduce the effects of chance?

Scientists encourage other scientists to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypotheses may become Scientists encourage other scientists to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypotheses may become


Why should scientists repeat their experiments?

They repeat them in order to try and see if it will fail. They may add or remove different variables depending on the results to see if something is effecting the experiment correctly or falsely. Start with a hypothesis and then test it and when you feel you are finished test it thats when the real testing begins.


When scientists analyze the results of their experiments then they?

They see if the results are what they expected them to be. If they were not, they try again. If they did, they then ask other scientists if they also got the same results. They do this part by publishing the experiment and results in a scientific journal and as for comments.


When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?

Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.


When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures the used?

Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.

Related questions

What is it called when scientists do their experimental tests more than once so they can reduce the effects of chance?

Scientists encourage other scientists to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypotheses may become Scientists encourage other scientists to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypotheses may become


Why should scientists repeat their experiments?

They repeat them in order to try and see if it will fail. They may add or remove different variables depending on the results to see if something is effecting the experiment correctly or falsely. Start with a hypothesis and then test it and when you feel you are finished test it thats when the real testing begins.


When scientists analyze the results of their experiments then they?

They see if the results are what they expected them to be. If they were not, they try again. If they did, they then ask other scientists if they also got the same results. They do this part by publishing the experiment and results in a scientific journal and as for comments.


What else do sciestist do other than organze the data?

Scientists also design and perform the experiments in which the data was collected. They also analyze the data and try to explain them.


How did alchemists similar to and different from modern scientists?

The alchemists were the first chemists. But in addition to mixing chemicals, they also believed that magic would help with their experiments and formulas. It didn't. But their experiments led to the development of the science of chemistry.


When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they use?

Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.


When scientists are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedure they used?

Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.


When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?

Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.


Scientists publish the details of important experiments so that?

Scientists publish the details of important experiments so that: 1. Others can try to reproduce the results. 2. Their work can be repeated. 3. Their experimental procedures can be reviewed.


When scientist analyze the result of their experiments they?

They see if the results are what they expected them to be. If they were not, they try again. If they did, they then ask other scientists if they also got the same results. They do this part by publishing the experiment and results in a scientific journal and as for comments.


When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?

Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.


When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures the used?

Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.