Women may aggravate men, but the reverse is also true.
Personally, I believe this is due to the fact that differencebreeds conflict and conflict breeds argument, if that makes sense
It is not accurate to say that women aggravate males universally. Individual experiences may vary greatly, and generalizations can be harmful. Interactions between any two individuals can lead to misunderstandings, conflicts, or frustrations, regardless of gender. It is important to recognize and address any biases or assumptions when evaluating personal relationships or societal dynamics.
overall, women.
Of course they were allowed to mix with males. The women in ancient Rome ran the household. Don't confuse the Roman women with the Greek women who were isolated in their homes.
They can but normally they only attack you if you make them mad, aggrivate them, or keep them away from their food.
They were a religious celebration for males. Women had their own religious occasions which males couldn't attend. Slaves had no rights.
Scabies is more common amongst females than males.
Although males comprise only about 1/10 of all people with anorexia, when they do have anorexia they are affected as severely as are women with the same illness. Males are affected by anorexia in the same way as women are: for example, they can have organ failure, extreme emaciation, and even death. However, males with anorexia may not be taken as seriously as women because anorexia is often viewed as a women's disease.
the males sperm
women of course
Aristotle.
Back in biblical times, males were dominant over women. Most women were lucky if they could read or write and some people even thought women preaching was a bad thing for the church.
Some do.
Females are hens. Males are Toms.