Probably so no one person or group can gain too much power economically. If only one brand of a certain product it being sold, then whoever owns the brand can make their product as expensives as they want, because there's no competition offering the same product for a lower price. They can also make it at a low quality, as there is no competition to make the same product at a better quality. Probably so no one person or group can gain too much power economically. If only one brand of a certain product it being sold, then whoever owns the brand can make their product as expensives as they want, because there's no competition offering the same product for a lower price. They can also make it at a low quality, as there is no competition to make the same product at a better quality.
law
A perfect competitive market and pure monopoly market both have to follow the "law of demand".
Yes, the Sherman anti-trust act of 1890 prohibited monopolies. This was a reaction to a contemporary controversy about the Standard Oil Company of Ohio maneuvering around state laws in order to form its own trust. This act put an end to companies being able to maneuver around laws like that. While other laws prohibited the means of achieving a monopoly, this act prohibited having a monopoly.
monopoly is a game and it is long and boring. It is stupid just like your face.
A monopoly is the ultimate goal of an individual company or enterprise in a truly capitalistic society. However, capitalism also means free and fair market competition so laws have been enacted to prevent total monopoly of any particular industry but not of a particular process, item or service.
Exclusive rights is a de facto, non-tangible prerogative. It is benefecial to monopoly business, because it can restrict others to perform the same business or productive activity, i.e, it restricts entry in monopoly business. Exclusive rights can be said a form of monopoly. It is also beneficial to property law, copyright law , patent law and to public utilities.
Antitrust Law
Yes, blackmail it is against the law.
George Cyriax has written: 'Monopoly and competition' -- subject(s): Antitrust law, Competition, Economic policy, Monopolies, Restraint of trade 'Monopoly and competition' -- subject(s): Restraint of trade, Antitrust law
monopoly is a game and it is long and boring. It is stupid just like your face.
"Illegal" means against the law. So yes, downloading illegally is against the law.
The law that prohibits actions that lead to a monopoly is the Sherman Antitrust Act. This legislation aims to promote fair competition by preventing businesses from engaging in practices that restrict trade or create monopolies that harm consumers.
There are many websites that allow users to play Monopoly for free. Some of the most popular are Pogo, EA, and Zylom. On many of these sites, one can play Monopoly against other players as well.
True
No, yelling at your children is not against the law.
No there is not a law against it.
Yes it's against the law