We don't know. We can't really study how they evolved because they don't leave fossils. There are several different theories as to how they evolved - they could have been bits of cells, or random self-reproducing molecules, or particular cells that lost all of their useful parts except for DNA/RNA.
answer 2:
Probably viruses exists longer as life (a we define it today) itself. Probably the first mechanisms of life are early forms of DNA/RNA without a skin. I think the earliest forms of life started in an area with a source of the same building blocks and an area dense but liquid enough to carry them like water. To me it sounds logical that futher away from this source, where building blocks became scarce, these molecules could not reproduce anymore. By time, chance and exemplary differences, only the ones that adapt to the changed environment could carry themselfs futher away, benefit from that and adapt (develop) even more. The ones that developed a skin which acted like a sealed buffer with building blocks as a reserve within and became more self supporting, could carry itself to other places and develop even more from that. This cellular form of life is related to the life as we know it today and is also more developed and abundant. Probably the skinless forms didn't go away completely. They invaded those buffers and made use of it as well and now they still exists as viruses today.
Interesting to know is that sea is full of viruses (1 to 10 billion per 1 liter of water) and play a large role in that ecosystem.
Just like people need to reproduce, it is inherent in nature for other types of organisms to reproduce as well. The ultimate question (i.e., "Why is there life?") is yet to be answered by science. Many philosophies and religions attempt to answer this, sometimes in very different ways. It is part of the exciting mystery of life.
It takes over the protein production mechanisms & nucleic acid duplication mechanisms of the cell it infects to reproduce. Without those cellular mechanisms the virus is just an inert particle of nucleic acid and protein that does nothing.
There is no other living thing that requires a virus in order to reproduce.
A virus needs a host cell because it can not produce more of itself without the host. It is as if you could not be able to think if you had no brain, or walk without legs.
a host cell so that the virus is able to use the host's cell machinery to replicate
A virus will replicate within a host cell.
Viruses replicate by hijacking a host's cells. The virus inserts its own RNA sequence into the host cell's nucleus, forcing it to replicate the virus until the host cell dies.
A virus replicates its DNA in a cell when it infects the host
It can reproduce if it infected a host cell!
A cell invaded by a virus is known as the 'host cell', as it 'hosted' the virus with shelter and food.
Viruses do not directly need energy. The virus takes control of the host cell in order to replicate. The host cell's own metabolic machinery is used to synthesize the components of new viruses. The virus itself is passive.
For a virus to replicate it must insert its own DNA into a host nucleus cell. This newly infected cell finds another host cell to replicate, and a viral infection is produced.
Ribosome
nope a virus requires a host cell in order to replicate. it lacks the mechanisms to reproduce copies on its own
Yes, they implant their DNA into a cell. The DNA tells the cell to replicate the virus inside itself. When the cell is full of the virus, it explodes, releasing viruses all around the targeted area.
the virus needs a host cell. it invades the cell, and then makes the cell make more viruses, and then they burst out and destroy the cell that they came from, and they invade more cells, and its just one big chain. Then it starts to destroy the T cells