Why does evolution disprove creationism?

Minor adaptations and changes, as can be observed in living things today, are of course not denied or disproved by Creationism. What Creationism does deny is the notion that Evolution could bring about new species or even new organs. See also: Is there evidence against Evolution? Can you show that God exists? Seeing God's wisdom

indeed I do, but creationism belongs in religous education whereas Evolution belongs in science

No where. Science has yet to prove or disprove Creationism

she says that its nessesary to know about creationism along with evolution

1) In order to reconcile Creation with Evolution, Old-Earth Creationism holds that God made the universe and then guided Evolution over long epochs. 2) In repudiation of Evolution, Young-Earth Creationism holds that God created the universe and living things relatively recently without the use of Evolution. See also the Related Links. Link: Evidence for Creation Link: Can you show that God exists Link: God's wisdom seen in His creations

Evolution was the starting point for Reincarnation.

Evolution does NOT involve creationism. Evolution is a testable and therefore provable explanation as to how the diversity of life on earth has happened. Creationism is a religious viewpoint and therefore a mater of faith. Answer I agree with the above. Evolution does NOT involve Creationism. Evolution is a branch of biological science and thus rejects "supernatural" claims such as those of Creationism, does not need to consider them. Creationism, often hanging on Genesis, the first book of the Bible, predates scientific inquiry and the scientific method and so is thus rejected by science and thus evolutionary science. In the public spotlight, the so-called Evolution-Creation "controversy" and all the on-stage arguments and debates might make it seem as though Evolution and Creationism (and Intelligent Design) have a lot to do with one another, but I doubt Creationism gets much mention at all in scientific laboratories and scientific conferences (it can't because it hasn't got anything to say about the real world.)

They do not. Nothing "disproves" evolution. It is impossible to prove or disprove anything scientifically. That's a basic rule of science: everything is subjected to doubt.

sure, schoolpapersadviser.com

Christian Kummer has written: 'Der Fall Darwin' -- subject(s): Evolution (Biology), Creationism 'Der Fall Darwin' -- subject(s): Evolution (Biology), Creationism

President Eisenhower did not mandate evolution, this is a myth as far as my research has shown. As a matter of fact he was a staunch believer in Creationism. See link: http://www.icr.org/article/presidential-support-for-creationism

it dosent evolution is all just a way to disprove god

reconciliation of Creation with Evolution is the view of Old-Earth Creationism, which holds that God made the universe and then guided Evolution over long epochs. In repudiation of Evolution, however, Young-Earth Creationism holds that God created the universe and living things relatively recently without the use of Evolution. See also: Is there evidence for Creation? Can you show that God exists? Seeing God's wisdom

Evolution vs. Creationism (mythology)

Buddhist believe there are no gods. Evolution would be the logical belief they would follow.

That which does not provide evidence for evolution is not necessarily something that tends to disprove evolution. So it is hard to narrow down to something relevant but does not provide evidence for evolution. As for something that actually tends to disprove evolution, this is equally hard but for different reasons - the evidence for evolution is so overwhelming that there is very little that can provide any form of contrary evidence.

No fossils disprove evolution, but support it

Converging Zone - 2012 Creationism vs- Evolution 1-1 was released on: USA: 19 July 2012

Each should be taught in the appropriate context, as long as it is legal to do so. Evolution should be taught in science lessons, since it is a science but, of course, not in religious lessons. Creationism may be taught in lessons on religion if religious instruction is a permitted part of the curriculum. Being a topic of religion, creationism should not be taught alongside evolution in science courses.

If you believe in creationism, it was the turkey. If you believe in evolution, it was the egg.

No. Because creationism is the belief a deity created life. If aliens were proved to exist, it would not negate it because there would still be no evidence to prove or disprove the fact they were also created by a deity.

Hans R. Preuss has written: 'Evolution des Glaubens' -- subject(s): Bible and evolution, Evolution (Biology), Christianity, Social evolution, Creationism

Creationism is religious dogma. Nothing proves its correctness. As any scientist with a dictionary would tell you, nothing proves evolution either. But there is a heck of a lot of evidence and testing that suggests it is about as right as we can get.

No. Evolution is what scientists say really happened. Various forms of creationism are alternative attempts to explain how a deity might have created us.

Of course someone could.