Because it takes more force to give a larger mass the same acceleration. So it all balances out ...
less force of gravity on a smaller mass, more force of gravity on a larger mass, always produces
the same acceleration.
the more mass the object has the stronger the gravity will pull down on the object making it heavier
gravity
The reason that a heavier object does not fall faster even though there is more gravitational force on it is because it has more mass, and more energy is required to accelerate the greater mass. A small mass doesn't need a lot of force on it to accelerate it. It's "light" in weight. But a heavier one needs more force on it to accelerate it equally. Want a heavier object to accelerate the same as a lighter one? Apply more force. Gravity does that. Automatically. Think it through and it will lock in.
more mass in motion= higher stored energy, requiring more forces (friction, gravity) to still the momentum of the heavier object.
If object "A" is heavier than object "B", then object "A" also has more mass (weight = mass x gravity, and gravity can be assumed to be constant for most practical purposes). And more mass causes more inertia - inertia is the direct result of the amount of mass.
because there is no gravity on mars and it doesnt pull down on the object to make it heavier
if an object is lightr it will fall slower because gravity wont take it down as fast if it is heavier it will make the gravity pull it down faster
No because of gravity who doesnt knkow that j jk jk jp jjp jp
Gravity effects heavier objects. In other words the heavier the object is, the more gravity effects the object which makes it heavy.
the more mass the object has the stronger the gravity will pull down on the object making it heavier
gravity
Gravity, the heavier the object the more force gravity has on it, and the faster it can accell before the force of friction (from the wheels, road surface and air) equal the force of gravity till it hits is maximum speed.
Aristotle did not have a specific theory of gravity as we understand it today. He believed in the natural motion of objects toward their natural place in the universe (e.g., heavier objects falling towards Earth, and lighter objects rising). His view was different from the modern understanding of gravity as a force of attraction between objects with mass.
The reason that a heavier object does not fall faster even though there is more gravitational force on it is because it has more mass, and more energy is required to accelerate the greater mass. A small mass doesn't need a lot of force on it to accelerate it. It's "light" in weight. But a heavier one needs more force on it to accelerate it equally. Want a heavier object to accelerate the same as a lighter one? Apply more force. Gravity does that. Automatically. Think it through and it will lock in.
more mass in motion= higher stored energy, requiring more forces (friction, gravity) to still the momentum of the heavier object.
If object "A" is heavier than object "B", then object "A" also has more mass (weight = mass x gravity, and gravity can be assumed to be constant for most practical purposes). And more mass causes more inertia - inertia is the direct result of the amount of mass.
The earth's gravity is about six times that of the gravity of the moon and weight is proportional to gravitational attraction.