Theories never become laws. Theories explain facts and scientific observations; laws describe the behavior of an object in nature. A scientific law explains what will happen, but it doesn't explain why. Theories explain why.
Laws can only be changed if enough evidence has been given to disprove the law and place another law in its place. Theories change all the time. Theories are basically a question that scientist try to answer. Theories are just an idea that scientists give as an explanation to a question but they are not sure yet
It has been proven, as opposed to not being disproven. Theories have not been dis proven, but have not been proven, or are unable to be proven, but are otherwise acceptable as factual.
Scientific laws and scientific theories are both based on observations and experimental results.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics
Scientific laws can be revised, although that doesn't happen very often. New observations and new analyses of observations can lead to revisions of theories, including the laws that are contained in those theories. An example of this concerns the law of conservation of mass. This law still applies in its original form to chemical reactions, but it has also been discovered that due to the mass-energy equivalency that was first described by Einstein, mass is not always conserved, and a better formulation of the law is that mass-energy is conserved.
all theories don't become laws
A law cannot become a theory, as laws are higher in scientific hierarchy than theories. Theories may become laws when the evidence for their factuality proves that the theory meets all established requirements set forth by the theory. If at any point in the scientific method a theory is disproven for the criteria that it sets forth, it can never be considered a Law. The hierarchy is thusly: Hypothesis < Theory < Law.
the term law is rarely applied anymore in science. it used to be used to refer to theories so well tested that no reasonable person could reasonably doubt their validity.
A scientific theory become a law when it is widely recognized and accepted by the scientific community in the epoch.
Scientifically speaking, theories do not become facts. Facts are things that are observed to be true; theories are created to explain why a particular set of facts are true.
In the scientific context, theories and laws serve different purposes. Theories are overarching explanations supported by a large body of evidence, while laws are concise statements describing natural phenomena. Theories do not "become" laws; they complement each other by providing explanations and descriptions in science.
no i dont believe
Theories can evolve and change over time as new evidence is discovered or different perspectives are considered. They may be refined, expanded upon, or even replaced by new theories that better explain a phenomenon. Additionally, theories may become widely accepted within a scientific community or society as a whole as they stand the test of time and scrutiny.
Dont argue
all theories don't become laws
In criminal law there are many schools of thought and theories that conflict depending on which area you are referring to. There are basic sides of criminal law the prosecution and the defense and with those divides there are many different theories of how to handle evidence, testimony, interviewing witnesses and charges to be filed.
Usually tradition ... no real reason.