0
Why has the US military generally preferred a strategy of annihilation over that of attrition in wartime?
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did the US military strategy generally evolve from annihilation to attrition over the course of each of its wars?
- US forces were unable to obtain a single decisive victory during the Civil War and WWI.- The numerical superiority possessed by the US always ensured victory through attrition.- American public opinion did not support the use of an annihilation strategy.x Attrition was a more cost effective means of waging war compared to annihilation. [doubt it]
Why was the strategy of General US Grant not geared to the military concept of annihilation?
Strategically, General Grant was pursuing attrition rather than annihilation of the Confederacy. Based on the way the war had turned out, it was clear that the decisive battle of annihilation was not going to end the war.
What is annial?
The word annihilation describes an act or process of overwhelming something or something and destroying the thing or person. The military's actions resulted in total annihilation of its enemy.
What were strategic objectives of US Military Assistance Command in Vietnam War?
Attrition of the enemy, with body counts.
What has the author Elliott Smith written?
Elliott Smith has written: 'Asonished at Being' 'Military Attrition' 'To the bitter end'
What caused the War of Attrition in the Middle East?
The War of Attrition was caused by Egyptian attempts to reverse the gains made by Israel in the Six-Day War without attacking in a forceful-enough-way to merit an Israeli military response.
What has the author Elizabeth S Hostetler written?
Elizabeth S. Hostetler has written: 'Analysis of advancement and attrition in the Military Ceremonial Units'
What is attrition of war in the US Civil War?
The term in military science is "War of Attrition". A war of attrition occurs when neither side has the strength or competency to defeat the other quickly and decisively in what is known as a "coup de main" Both sides fight it out over a period of time taking losses and using material. In a war of attrition the side with the most manpower and weapons wins but with losses equal to or greater then the weaker side. This is true of the American Civil War in general and the Seige of Petersburg in particular.
What describes the tactics Eisenhower and Dulles preferred to use to deal with threats abroad?
shrinking military
Why might the wealthy have preferred military rule to land reform?
The wealthy might have preferred military rule to land reform because military rulers tend to maintain the existing power structure and protect the interests of the elite class, including landowners. Land reform could threaten their wealth and privilege by redistributing land to the poor and landless, potentially reducing the wealthy's influence and control.
Can retarded people join the military?
Generally if they can graduate from high school, they can join the military.
Tactics Eisenhower and Dulles preferred to use to deal with threats abroad?
Shrinking the conventional military forces
