It is actually a reliable source, as long as people put in the correct answers.
However, there's no way to confirm that we are putting the correct answers, and you don't really know who any of us are or what our credentials are. You just have to trust us, and in the realm of factual information, trust carries little weight.
One way to know is if we put sources or related links. This way, you know that the answer is credible.
Because anyone can say anything, and sometimes people post random things or wrong answers.
People could write anything true or false
WIKEPEDIA!
No, it is a very unreliable and inefficient energy source.
They are unreliable.
No. Blogs contain opinions and ranting. They are unreliable.
Only experience can tell you that. A source whose information checks out when compared to reality (e.g. other sources) is usually reliable, while a source whose data turns out not to match reality would be considered unreliable.
Its fun here. Source: Me :-)
He is not dead. Wherever you heard that is an unreliable source of information
The first thing you would do is state what 'this' source is.
No. Wind farms are very unreliable as a constant source of energy. They are also expensive to build and maintain.
because the inventor of answers.com thought of that name and it has answers.com because you can answer questions....
Wikipedia can sometimes mislead readers because anybody can put information on that website.
When the information is posted without a specific source, the validity of the information cannot be determined or evaluated.
One unreliable source says that Anne's parents were Stollanus and Emerentia. However. we really do not know.