Kenny's remark that you should never trust a cripple is ironic because it reflects a prejudiced viewpoint that undermines the capabilities and integrity of individuals with disabilities. Instead of recognizing their resilience and potential, the statement perpetuates stereotypes and discrimination. The irony lies in the fact that such a remark reveals more about Kenny's character and biases than about those he is judging. Ultimately, it highlights the societal tendency to view disability through a lens of mistrust or pity, rather than understanding and respect.
Actually, it would be "remarks" if the Minister is to make more than one remark... If the Minister will only make ONE remark, the word "remark" should be preceded by the word "a".
Good work.
Helen Smith.
it's exactly why you should hire a farrier. do you want to cripple your horse?
idiot and who ever wrote imboseal should should spell check their answers, and its kind of ironic...
yes of course that is the best prescription for a cripple. but if you have not had surgery it is terrible. No, no one, especially people who have had surgery, should be around poison ivy.
Julius Caesar is a play by William Shakespeare. The third plebeian's cry of "let him be Caesar" is ironic as Brutus had previously stated that if he were to rule like Caesar then he too should be killed.
More information may be obtained on the vehicle inquiring by VIN.
Reading Righting Rithmatic It should be Reading, Writing and Arithmetic, but I suppose it was meant to be ironic.
After the Confederate victory at the Battle of Fredericksburg, Robert E. Lee made his classic remark to General Longstreet that is now in the public domain. The quote was "It's well that war is so terrible---we should grow to fond of it".
The Tools column on the row should be clicked that is wanted to add remark to and "Remarks" option is chosen later. Every time a person fills in published online forms and presses on 'submit' button the form owner automatically receives a new data e-mail.
The more i think about this, the less sure i am. this essay is a definition essay, defining cripple. The thesis, therefore, is to define cripple. The purpose is to show that even a cripple can live a rewading life, but the thesis is to define the meaning of cripple. I can't decide if the introduction is traditional (general to specific, containing the thesis as the last sentence) or non traditional. I would say it is traditional because it gives a general description of a clumsy person, doesn't just start with the definition, but the thesis sentence in a traditional intro should be the last sentence. The last sentence however is "I decided that it was high time to write the essay." What i think the thesis sentence is, the first (not last) sentence of the intro: "....i was thinking on writing any essay on being a cripple" SO, is it a traditional or non-traditional introduction? I have not attached the essay written by NANCY MAIRS. My question is if the essay has a traditional or non traditional introduction and why? thank you.