The main advantage of biomass over coal is that it is "carbon neutral". This means that in order for the biomass to be created, it consumed carbon dioxide from the environment. Upon burning biomass, no additional carbon is added to our atmosphere. Coal, on the other hand, is taking carbon out of the earth and adding more to our atmosphere.
Biomass can be regrown quickly, making it a good alternative to coal.
Biomass is considered better than coal because it is renewable and emits less carbon dioxide when burned. Biomass can also be sourced locally, reducing transportation emissions, and it can be a more sustainable option in terms of resource management.
Biomass is considered better than coal because it is renewable, meaning it can be replenished relatively quickly. Biomass also produces lower emissions of greenhouse gases when burned compared to coal, making it a cleaner source of energy. Additionally, biomass can be locally sourced, reducing transportation emissions and supporting local economies.
Burning biomass is considered better than burning oil or coal because biomass is a renewable energy source that can be produced sustainably, whereas oil and coal are fossil fuels that contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Additionally, burning biomass can help reduce waste by using organic materials that would otherwise be disposed of in landfills.
One advantage of coal over biomass as a fuel is its higher energy density. Coal contains more energy per unit of weight or volume compared to biomass, making it more efficient for generating electricity or heat.
Biomass can be regrown quickly, making it a good alternative to coal.
Biomass is considered better than coal because it is renewable and emits less carbon dioxide when burned. Biomass can also be sourced locally, reducing transportation emissions, and it can be a more sustainable option in terms of resource management.
Biomass is considered better than coal because it is renewable, meaning it can be replenished relatively quickly. Biomass also produces lower emissions of greenhouse gases when burned compared to coal, making it a cleaner source of energy. Additionally, biomass can be locally sourced, reducing transportation emissions and supporting local economies.
Burning biomass is considered better than burning oil or coal because biomass is a renewable energy source that can be produced sustainably, whereas oil and coal are fossil fuels that contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Additionally, burning biomass can help reduce waste by using organic materials that would otherwise be disposed of in landfills.
I am pretty sure that LESS electricity is generated with biomass, meaning that its use is not as common as coal.
YES......For obvious reasons=biomass is renewable!=
No, coal is not an alternative energy source. "Alternative" energy sources means energy sources other than fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas).
One advantage of coal over biomass as a fuel is its higher energy density. Coal contains more energy per unit of weight or volume compared to biomass, making it more efficient for generating electricity or heat.
Because we are using coal up faster than it is produced.
Is cols better than cola? did you mean: coal?did you mean: coal?i wouldn't recomend eating coal on a diet. And coal is not better than coal. Sorry. Coca-Cola isn't as good as Dr.Pepper
An answer is impossible, valid for all countries. Uranium is less pollutant than coal and release more energy; also it is an alternative to fossil fuels. I consider that the sources of energy of the world must be variate.
it is the most versatile